Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence.

C M Rotello1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003-7710, USA. caren@psych.umass.edu

Memory (Hove, England)
|January 25, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2001
Same author

Memory characteristics of recently imagined events and real events experienced previously.

The American journal of psychology·2000
Same author

Associative recognition: a case of recall-to-reject processing.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated the metamemory hypothesis for recognizing new items. Findings indicate that neither stimulus salience nor metacognitive judgments reliably predict recognition decisions for distractors.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • The metamemory hypothesis suggests that recognizing distractor items as 'new' relies on evaluating their memorability or salience.
  • This hypothesis posits that if a salient item lacks a memory trace, it's inferred as not studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the validity of the metamemory hypothesis concerning the recognition of distractor items.
  • To investigate the role of stimulus salience and metacognitive judgments in distractor recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to assess the metamemory hypothesis.
  • Methods included measuring judged salience, metacognitive judgments, confidence judgments, and recognition accuracy for distractor items.
  • Instructional manipulations were used to influence metacognitive processes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Judged salience of stimuli did not predict participants' recognition judgments for distractors across Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2.
  • Instructional manipulations aimed at affecting metacognitive processes did not alter recognition judgments in Experiments 3a and 3b.
  • Confidence judgments in Experiment 4 did not support the predictions of the metamemory hypothesis.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide no evidence to support the metamemory hypothesis regarding distractor recognition.
  • The results suggest that stimulus salience and metacognitive evaluations are not primary drivers of recognizing items as new.