Biomechanical analysis of the Medoff sliding plate
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2026
A Friction Testing-Bioreactor Device for Study of Synovial Joint Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, and Physical Regulation
Published on: June 2, 2022
M N Mahomed1, I J Harrington, T C Hearn
1Toronto East General & Orthopaedic Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
A new device for fixation of hip fractures the Medoff plate was biomechanically tested and compared with the Ambi plate and Gamma nail.
Methods:
Six pairs of human cadaveric femurs were used. The characteristics evaluated were structural stiffness, strain distribution, and modes of failure. Results were compared with the Ambi plate and Gamma nail biomechanical studies from a previous study that used the same methods.
Results:
The Medoff plate was stiffer than the other two implants for intertrochanteric fractures, and for segmental subtrochanteric fracture. The Medoff plate was more load sharing than the other implants in these fracture configurations. The mean load to failure was lower than for the Ambi plate or the Gamma nail.
Conclusion:
The Medoff plate is a better load-sharing device than the Ambi (DHS) or Gamma nail systems. The main concern is its structural weakness. The implant failed at loads 50% less than other devices. The greatest risk of implant failure is with unstable subtrochanteric fractures.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Machines: Problem Solving I
The toggle clamp system is a machine structure consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that form a stabilized system to transmit forces. The...
01:24Wedges
Consider using a wedge to lift a heavy slab. Here, the wedge functions by converting the applied force into a much larger force directed almost perpendicular to the initial force. This...