Related Experiment Videos
Complementary therapies: the American experience
1Integrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. Cassileth@mskcc.org
Summary
This article clarifies complementary vs. alternative medicine (CAM) use in the USA, focusing on cancer patients. It details beneficial complementary therapies for cancer treatment and rehabilitation.
Area of Science:
- Integrative Oncology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) encompasses a wide range of health care approaches.
- Understanding CAM use is crucial for patient-centered care, especially in oncology.
- Prevalence and patterns of CAM utilization vary significantly across populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To differentiate between complementary and alternative medicine.
- To describe the current utilization of CAM therapies in the United States.
- To provide an in-depth overview of complementary therapies beneficial for cancer patients.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and synthesis of existing data on CAM usage.
- Analysis of prevalence rates of complementary and alternative medicine in the general population and among cancer patients.
- Focused review on complementary therapies relevant to cancer treatment and survivorship.
Main Results:
- CAM use is prevalent, with significant variation in specific therapies and patient groups.
- Cancer patients report substantial use of complementary therapies during and after treatment.
- Specific complementary therapies show promise in managing treatment side effects and improving quality of life.
Conclusions:
- Clear distinction between complementary and alternative medicine is essential for accurate research and clinical guidance.
- Complementary therapies are widely used by cancer patients in the USA.
- Further research should focus on the efficacy and integration of beneficial complementary therapies into standard cancer care.