Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

P L Leggett1, R Churchman-Winn, G Miller

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Texas-Houston Northwest Medical Center, 77090, USA.

Surgical Endoscopy
|February 1, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Minimizing ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces pain and speeds recovery. Shorter incisions in microlaparoscopic procedures significantly decrease incisional pain, enhancing patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma? A study of quality of life.

World journal of surgery·1998
Same author

The development of general practice standards in Australia. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

Medical education·1998
Same author

Transgenic mice for interleukin 3 develop motor neuron degeneration associated with autoimmune reaction against spinal cord motor neurons.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1998
Same author

The Epstein-Barr virus Rta protein activates lytic cycle genes and can disrupt latency in B lymphocytes.

Journal of virology·1998
Same author

A functionally distinct TATA box required for late progression through the Epstein-Barr virus life cycle.

Journal of virology·1998
Same author

A viral gene that activates lytic cycle expression of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1998

Area of Science:

  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Surgical techniques
  • Gastrointestinal surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers advantages over open surgery, including reduced pain and faster recovery.
  • Further refinement aims to minimize surgical invasiveness by reducing port number and size.
  • Optimizing port strategy enhances patient satisfaction and cosmetic results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of reducing port number and size on outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • To compare patient-reported pain and recovery metrics between different port configurations.
  • To assess the safety and feasibility of microlaparoscopic approaches.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized trial involving 41 patients compared three 5-mm ports versus two 10-mm and one 5-mm port.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A subsequent observational study examined a three 5-mm port procedure in 100 patients.
  • Patient-reported pain, medication use, and return to activity were primary outcome measures.

    • Main Results:

    • While not statistically significant in the randomized trial, the three 5-mm port group showed trends towards less pain and faster recovery.
    • A statistically significant reduction in incisional pain was observed in patients with smaller port sizes (p = 0.014).
    • No conversions to open surgery, additional ports, or complications occurred; all patients were discharged the same day.

    Conclusions:

    • Reducing port number and size in laparoscopic cholecystectomy maintains or improves upon the benefits of the laparoscopic approach.
    • Microlaparoscopic procedures with shorter incisions lead to significantly less incisional pain.
    • Smaller port sizes enhance postoperative pain control and facilitate quicker patient recovery.