The sensitivity of thin-slice fast spin echo, fast FLAIR and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequences in

N Tubridy1, P D Molyneux, I F Moseley

  • 1NMR Unit, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

Journal of Neurology
|February 1, 2000
PubMed

Insights

Fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) and fast spin echo (FSE) MRI detect similar numbers of new multiple sclerosis lesions. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is more sensitive for detecting active lesions in MS studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Neurology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease.
  • Accurate lesion detection is crucial for monitoring MS progression.
  • Comparing MRI sequences aids in optimizing imaging protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) and proton density/T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) MRI sequences in detecting new and enlarging lesions in multiple sclerosis patients.
  • To evaluate the sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging in identifying active MS lesions.

Main Methods:

  • 37 multiple sclerosis patients underwent monthly MRI scans for 7 months.
  • 3-mm contiguous axial slices were used for FLAIR, FSE, and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequences.
  • New and enlarging lesions were counted and compared between sequences, with a focus on lesion site and enhancement.

Main Results:

  • Overall, 126 new or enlarging lesions were detected with FSE and 135 with fast FLAIR (P = 0.25).
  • Fast FLAIR showed significantly more lesions in cortical/subcortical areas.
  • Gadolinium-enhanced MRI revealed 295 new enhancing lesions, indicating significantly higher sensitivity to active lesion activity.

Conclusions:

  • Serial thin-slice fast FLAIR MRI offers only a slight advantage over FSE for detecting new/enlarging MS lesions.
  • The difference is insufficient to recommend replacing FSE with FLAIR in short-term, monthly MS trials.
  • Gadolinium-enhanced imaging is substantially more sensitive and should be the primary outcome measure for assessing new MS lesion activity in such studies.