Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

09:01
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|February 2, 2000
Summary
Revision hip surgery using large acetabular components can achieve excellent outcomes in patients with significant bone loss. However, this complex procedure is associated with a high complication rate, particularly infection.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Acetabular revision surgery for major bone stock deficiency presents significant challenges.
- The use of large, hemispherical cementless acetabular components (jumbo components) is one approach for complex hip reconstructions.
- Optimal surgical techniques for these challenging cases remain debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes of acetabular revision using large (≥66 mm diameter) cementless hemispherical acetabular components.
- To assess the efficacy and complication rates associated with this reconstructive technique in hips with substantial bone loss.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 24 hips in 24 patients undergoing uncemented acetabular revision with a hemispherical component (≥66 mm diameter).
- Concurrent femoral component replacement was performed in 16 hips.
- Clinical and radiographic assessment at a mean follow-up of 7.0 years for surviving patients.
Main Results:
- No acetabular component required revision, and none showed radiographic loosening.
- The mean final Harris Hip Score was 86 points.
- A high overall complication rate was observed, with excellent results in cases without infection.
Conclusions:
- Large diameter cementless hemispherical acetabular components can provide durable fixation in complex acetabular revisions with major bone stock deficiency.
- Despite excellent implant survival and functional scores in non-infected cases, the overall complication rate necessitates careful patient selection and surgical planning.
- This technique offers a viable reconstructive option for challenging acetabular defects, but risks, particularly infection, must be managed.

