Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolutionarily Stable Strategies for Consuming a Structured Resource.

W G Wilson, S A Richards

    The American Naturalist
    |February 5, 2000
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Oxidative β-C-H sulfonylation of cyclic amines.

    Chemical science·2018
    Same author

    Dynamics of age-structured and spatially structured predator-prey interactions: individual-based models and population-level formulations.

    The American naturalist·2009
    Same author

    Ecosystem engineers: feedback and population dynamics.

    The American naturalist·2009
    Same author

    A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution.

    The American naturalist·2008
    Same author

    Resolving discrepancies between deterministic population models and individual-based simulations.

    The American naturalist·2008
    Same author

    Allocation to sexual versus nonsexual disease transmission.

    The American naturalist·2008
    Same journal

    Traffic Reduction during COVID-19 Lockdowns Benefited Species Already Tolerant of Noise Pollution: An Acoustic Analysis.

    The American naturalist·2026
    Same journal

    On Pachycephalosaurs, Trade-Offs, and the Historical Genesis of Sociosexual Display Structures.

    The American naturalist·2026
    Same journal

    Structured Landscapes Promote Persistence by Favoring Prudent Predators.

    The American naturalist·2026
    Same journal

    Can Carbon Economy Explain Leaf Dynamic Seasonality in a Tropical Seasonal Rainforest?

    The American naturalist·2026
    Same journal

    Behavior and Physiology Outpace Form When Linking Traits to Ecological Responses within Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

    The American naturalist·2026
    Same journal

    Seminal Fluid Proteins as Regulation Factors for Optimizing Reproduction: A Modeling Approach.

    The American naturalist·2026
    See all related articles

    This study explores consumer foraging strategies and their impact on resource distribution. Flexible foraging in spatial environments promotes consumer grouping and the coexistence of diverse strategies, explaining natural patterns.

    Area of Science:

    • Ecology
    • Evolutionary Biology
    • Theoretical Ecology

    Background:

    • Understanding consumer-resource dynamics is crucial in ecology.
    • Foraging behavior significantly influences population dynamics and resource availability.
    • Previous models often simplify foraging strategies or environmental structure.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine a general consumer-resource model with discrete consumers and a continuous resource.
    • To investigate the evolutionary stability of fixed versus flexible foraging strategies.
    • To analyze the impact of spatial environments on foraging behavior and consumer distribution.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a general consumer-resource model.
    • Inclusion of a consumer energetics model linking consumption, behavior, and metabolism.
    Keywords:
    competitive coexistenceevolutionary stable strategiesexploitation competitionforagingresource structurespatial structure

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of foraging strategies in both nonspatial and spatial environments.
  • Main Results:

    • A single evolutionarily stable foraging strategy exists in nonspatial environments.
    • Flexible foraging in spatial environments leads to consumer grouping and altered resource distribution.
    • No single foraging strategy can exclude others in spatial environments, leading to coexistence.

    Conclusions:

    • Flexible foraging in spatial settings promotes the stable coexistence of multiple strategies.
    • This coexistence may explain observed dichotomous patterns in natural systems.
    • The model provides insights into the evolution of foraging behavior and its ecological consequences.