Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

07:34
FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
The triple-marker test in predicting fetal aneuploidy: a compromise between sensitivity and specificity
K Huderer-Duric1, S Skrablin, I Kuvacic
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia.
European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
|February 5, 2000
Summary
Unconjugated estriol significantly aids in Down syndrome detection, though it slightly lowers specificity. A higher risk cut-off (1:100) improves test performance for trisomy screening.
Area of Science:
- Prenatal diagnostics
- Biochemical screening
- Genetics
Background:
- Down syndrome (trisomy 21) is a common chromosomal abnormality.
- Prenatal screening aims to identify pregnancies at increased risk for Down syndrome.
- Triple-marker screening (alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated estriol) is a widely used method.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role of unconjugated estriol in Down syndrome detection.
- To assess the impact of maternal age, cut-off choice, and population specificity on screening performance.
- To optimize the balance between sensitivity and specificity in the triple-marker test.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of serum markers (alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated estriol) in 2833 pregnant women.
- Calculation of trisomy 21 risk using default and population-specific medians.
- Testing different risk cut-offs (1:300, 1:200, 1:100) and evaluating marker contributions via logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Unconjugated estriol exclusion reduced detection rates by 33% and improved specificity by 4%.
- A cut-off of 1:300 yielded 87.5% sensitivity and 63.3% specificity; a 1:100 cut-off yielded 66.7% sensitivity and 79.5% specificity.
- Unconjugated estriol was the only marker significantly classifying patients into normal and trisomic groups (trisomy 21 and 18).
Conclusions:
- Unconjugated estriol is crucial for Down syndrome detection, despite a minor decrease in specificity.
- A 1:300 risk cut-off presents an unfavorable sensitivity-specificity balance.
- A 1:100 cut-off is recommended for higher-risk pregnancies, potentially guiding amniocentesis decisions.

