Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Are the MMPI subtle subscales subtle measures of their scales?
J L Mihura1, R S Schlottmann, A B Scott
1Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, OH 43606, USA. jmihura@pop3.utoledo.edu
Abstract:
This study investigated the ability of the MMPI Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales (on scales D. Hy, Pd, Pa, and Ma) to serve as subtle or unobtrusive measures of their scales. Forty outpatients completed the MMPI under standard instructions, followed by a fake-good or fake-bad instructional set. First, we investigated the paradoxical effect found in the MMPI faking literature (in which, overall, the subtle subscale T-scores change in a direction opposite of the faking instructions) and found that not every subtle subscale shows this effect. Secondly, the subtle subscale T-scores achieved under faking conditions showed no significant relationship to their respective full-scale T-scores achieved under standard conditions. Therefore, our results do not support the Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales as subtle measures of their scales.
Insights
The Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales on the MMPI do not effectively function as unobtrusive measures. Their scores under simulated conditions showed no correlation with standard scores, challenging their validity.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Personality testing
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is a widely used psychological assessment tool.
- Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales were developed to provide unobtrusive measures of specific MMPI scales.
- Previous research has yielded mixed results regarding the efficacy of these subtle subscales.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of the Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales (D, Hy, Pd, Pa, Ma) as subtle measures within the MMPI.
- To investigate the paradoxical effect in MMPI faking literature concerning subtle subscales.
- To determine if subtle subscale scores under faking conditions correlate with standard full-scale scores.
Main Methods:
- Forty outpatients completed the MMPI under standard instructions.
- Participants then completed the MMPI again under either fake-good or fake-bad instructional sets.
- Analysis focused on comparing T-scores of subtle subscales and full scales under different conditions.
Main Results:
- Not all subtle subscales exhibited the paradoxical effect where T-scores moved in the opposite direction of faking instructions.
- Subtle subscale T-scores obtained under faking conditions did not significantly correlate with their respective full-scale T-scores under standard conditions.
- The findings did not support the utility of the Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales as subtle indicators.
Conclusions:
- The Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales lack empirical support as subtle or unobtrusive measures of their respective MMPI scales.
- The study questions the validity and practical application of these subscales in psychological assessment.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative subtle measurement strategies in personality inventories.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Subliminal Perception
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Dark Triad and Person Perception

