Are the MMPI subtle subscales subtle measures of their scales?

J L Mihura1, R S Schlottmann, A B Scott

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, OH 43606, USA. jmihura@pop3.utoledo.edu

Insights

The Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales on the MMPI do not effectively function as unobtrusive measures. Their scores under simulated conditions showed no correlation with standard scores, challenging their validity.

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Personality testing
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is a widely used psychological assessment tool.
  • Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales were developed to provide unobtrusive measures of specific MMPI scales.
  • Previous research has yielded mixed results regarding the efficacy of these subtle subscales.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of the Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales (D, Hy, Pd, Pa, Ma) as subtle measures within the MMPI.
  • To investigate the paradoxical effect in MMPI faking literature concerning subtle subscales.
  • To determine if subtle subscale scores under faking conditions correlate with standard full-scale scores.

Main Methods:

  • Forty outpatients completed the MMPI under standard instructions.
  • Participants then completed the MMPI again under either fake-good or fake-bad instructional sets.
  • Analysis focused on comparing T-scores of subtle subscales and full scales under different conditions.

Main Results:

  • Not all subtle subscales exhibited the paradoxical effect where T-scores moved in the opposite direction of faking instructions.
  • Subtle subscale T-scores obtained under faking conditions did not significantly correlate with their respective full-scale T-scores under standard conditions.
  • The findings did not support the utility of the Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales as subtle indicators.

Conclusions:

  • The Wiener-Harmon subtle subscales lack empirical support as subtle or unobtrusive measures of their respective MMPI scales.
  • The study questions the validity and practical application of these subscales in psychological assessment.
  • Further research may be needed to explore alternative subtle measurement strategies in personality inventories.

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring01:24

Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
Dark Triad and Person Perception01:29

Dark Triad and Person Perception

Person perception is influenced by both external behaviors and the observer’s internal characteristics, including personality traits. Individuals with dark personality traits, comprising psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism — collectively known as the dark triad – exhibit manipulative and exploitative tendencies in social contexts. These traits affect how they perceive others and how they are perceived.The Role of Dark Personality Traits in Person PerceptionBlack et al. (2014) explored...