Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Control error statistics.

J R Buck1, S M Zellers, M E Opar

  • 1Department of Industrial Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.

Ergonomics
|February 8, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the Diagnosis of Phthisis Pulmonalis; Being an Extract from a Lecture Delivered at the General Dispensary, Louisville, Ky.

Western journal of medicine and surgery·2024
Same author

Cases of Fever with Remarks.

Western journal of medicine and surgery·2024
Same author

Lectures on Diseases of the Chest.

Western journal of medicine and surgery·2024
Same author

Lectures on Diseases of the Chest.

Western journal of medicine and surgery·2024
Same author

Lectures on Diseases of the Chest.

Western journal of medicine and surgery·2024
Same author

Lectures on Physical Diagnosis.

Western journal of medicine and surgery·2024
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

This study examines control error statistics in ergonomics, highlighting limitations of the root-mean-square (RMS) error. It introduces new metrics for better understanding manual control and tracking performance.

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Control Systems

Background:

  • Manual control and tracking are traditional ergonomics research areas.
  • Current research often uses root-mean-square (RMS) error to quantify control performance.
  • The authors argue that RMS error and similar statistics are not fully understood within the ergonomics community.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the understanding and application of control error statistics in ergonomics.
  • To introduce and explain novel statistical measures for control performance.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate performance criteria for tracking and manual control tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing control error statistics, focusing on RMS error.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development and theoretical exposition of new statistical measures for control error.
  • Analysis of the interrelationships between traditional and new statistical measures.

    • Main Results:

    • The study provides a background on RMS and related control error statistics.
    • New statistical measures for control error are presented.
    • The interrelationships between various statistical measures are explored.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing performance metrics like RMS error may not adequately capture the nuances of control tasks.
    • The proposed new statistics offer a more comprehensive approach to measuring control performance.
    • This work serves as a guide for researchers in selecting and measuring relevant criteria in tracking and manual control studies.