Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The compliance conundrum.

D R Roach1, C MacDonneil

  • 1Catholic Healthcare West, USA.

Journal of Health Law
|February 8, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Navigating healthcare law is challenging due to complex regulations and enforcement. This article explores compliance difficulties and proposes legal framework changes for efficient and just healthcare governance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Independent protective effects for tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin alpha in the host response to Listeria monocytogenes infection.

Infection and immunity·2005
Same author

How compliance changed healthcare. Compliance: a critical, yet costly commitment.

Journal of AHIMA·2003
Same author

Endogenous inhibition of antimycobacterial immunity by IL-10 varies between mycobacterial species.

Scandinavian journal of immunology·2001
Same author

Secreted lymphotoxin-alpha is essential for the control of an intracellular bacterial infection.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2001
Same author

A novel tumor necrosis factor (TNF) mimetic peptide prevents recrudescence of Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) infection in CD4+ T cell-depleted mice.

Journal of leukocyte biology·2000
Same author

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and a TNF-mimetic peptide modulate the granulomatous response to Mycobacterium bovis BCG infection in vivo.

Infection and immunity·1999
Same journal

Seven years until electronic health records: the negative effects of the new Stark exceptions and anti-kickback safe harbors.

Journal of health law·2007
Same journal

Caracci and the valuation of exempt organizations.

Journal of health law·2007
Same journal

Pharma on the hot seat.

Journal of health law·2007
Same journal

Prescription or proscription? The general failure of attempts to litigate and legislate against PBMS as "fiduciaries," and the role of market forces allowing PBMS to contain private-sector prescription drug prices.

Journal of health law·2007
Same journal

Beyond the anti-kickback statute: new entities, new theories in healthcare fraud prosecutions.

Journal of health law·2007
Same journal

Sample/recruitment process policy.

Journal of health law·2007
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Law
  • Regulatory Compliance
  • Legal Framework Analysis

Background:

  • Healthcare legal landscape is complex, characterized by intricate regulations and statutes.
  • Government agency guidance is often unclear, complicating compliance efforts.
  • Aggressive enforcement initiatives create a challenging environment for healthcare providers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine key legal issues within the healthcare sector.
  • To explain the difficulties encountered in establishing effective compliance programs.
  • To analyze challenges faced by providers when implementing compliance measures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing healthcare statutes and regulations.
  • Analysis of government agency guidance and enforcement actions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of case studies and provider experiences with compliance programs.

    • Main Results:

    • Healthcare providers face significant hurdles in establishing and maintaining compliance programs.
    • Ambiguous regulations and strict enforcement lead to legal complexities and potential penalties.
    • Current legal framework presents obstacles to achieving governmental healthcare goals efficiently.

    Conclusions:

    • Suggested modifications to the legal framework are necessary.
    • Proposed changes aim to enhance efficiency and fairness in healthcare governance.
    • Facilitating compliance can lead to better achievement of government objectives in healthcare.