Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Imaging for cochlear implants.

P D Phelps1, D W Proops

  • 1Department of Radiology, Walsgrave Hospital NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. Supplement
|February 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

George Allen Dalton.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2016
Same author

A smart micro-drill for cochleostomy formation: a comparison of cochlear disturbances with manual drilling and a human trial.

Cochlear implants international·2012
Same author

Biofilm formation on bone-anchored hearing aids.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2011
Same author

Bone-anchored hearing aids for people with bilateral hearing impairment: a systematic review.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2011
Same author

Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) for people who are bilaterally deaf: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2011
Same author

The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2010
Same journal

Management of composite defects of the nose, cheek, eyelids and upper lip.

The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2009
Same journal

Tetra-probe, 24-hour pH monitoring for laryngopharyngeal reflux: a technique for simultaneous study of hypopharynx, oesophagus and stomach.

The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2009
Same journal

Epithelioid sarcoma of the neck: case report.

The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2009
Same journal

Cricopharyngeal dysfunction with significant piriform sinus expansion: case report.

The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2009
Same journal

Supraglottic carcinoma treatment results analysed by therapeutic approach.

The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2009
Same journal

Clinical study of parapharyngeal space tumours.

The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2009
See all related articles

Computerized tomography (CT) imaging identified inner ear abnormalities in 20% of cochlear implant patients. The most common findings were cochlear otospongiosis and labyrinthitis ossificans, with CT effectively predicting patency.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Radiology
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation requires detailed assessment of inner ear anatomy.
  • Imaging plays a crucial role in identifying inner ear pathologies that may affect implant outcomes.
  • Understanding the prevalence and appearance of inner ear abnormalities is vital for surgical planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of computerized tomography (CT) in identifying inner ear abnormalities in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.
  • To determine the commonest inner ear pathologies observed in this patient cohort.
  • To compare the effectiveness of CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for specific pathologies.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of CT scans from the first 100 patients in the Birmingham Cochlear Implant Programme.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Image interpretation by the main author to identify and classify inner ear abnormalities.
  • Correlation of imaging findings with clinical context.

    • Main Results:

    • Twenty percent (20/100) of patients exhibited inner ear abnormalities on CT imaging.
    • Cochlear otospongiosis was the most frequent abnormality detected.
    • Labyrinthitis ossificans was the second most common finding.
    • CT imaging demonstrated good prediction of luminal patency in cases of otospongiosis.

    Conclusions:

    • CT scanning is effective in identifying cochlear otospongiosis and predicting luminal patency.
    • While CT can show labyrinthitis ossificans, T2-weighted MRI offers more reliable visualization of labyrinthus obliterans.
    • Imaging selection should be tailored to the suspected pathology for optimal assessment in cochlear implant candidates.