Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

[How can we justify scientific research?].

R Pedersen1

  • 1Senter for medisinsk etikk Fredrik Holsts hus Ullevål sykehus, Oslo. reidar.pedersen@basalmed.uio.no

Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening : Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, Ny Raekke
|February 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient preferences in geriatric wards, a survey of health care professionals' practice, experience and attitudes.

European geriatric medicine·2024
Same author

#ReadyToplay: hamstring injuries in women's football - a two-season prospective cohort study in the Norwegian women's premier league.

Science & medicine in football·2024
Same author

Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice.

BMC medical ethics·2019
Same author

Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010-2015: a qualitative content analyses.

BMC medical ethics·2018
Same author

A review of the implementation and research strategies of advance care planning in nursing homes.

BMC geriatrics·2016
Same author

Pruritus and quality of life in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: post hoc explorative analysis from the PRISTINE study.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2014
Same journal

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

Correction: Management of acute epistaxis.

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

A woman in her 70s with chest pain and elevated troponin T levels.

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

More systematic follow-up after childbirth.

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This paper examines the core values justifying scientific research, including personal fulfillment, social utility, and methodological norms like openness and autonomy. These historical values remain crucial for setting modern research priorities.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Ethics in Research

Context:

  • The justification and goals of scientific research have long been debated by philosophers and ethicists.
  • This debate is intrinsically linked to the underlying values that legitimize scientific endeavors.

Purpose:

  • To critically analyze the foundational values underpinning scientific research.
  • To explore the historical origins and contemporary relevance of these values in shaping research agendas.

Summary:

  • Investigates key values: professional personal fulfillment, social utility, and methodological norms (value neutrality, openness, autonomy).
  • Highlights how these values, despite diverse historical origins, continue to influence critical decisions, such as research priority setting.

Impact:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Provides a framework for understanding the ethical and philosophical underpinnings of scientific practice.
  • Offers insights into how historical values inform current research policy and priority-setting processes.