Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality specifications derived from objective analyses based upon clinical needs.

S Sandberg1, G Thue

  • 1Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. sverre.sandeberg@isf.uib.no

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
|February 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how to determine the quality of laboratory measurements needed for clinical decisions. Physicians are asked to identify when changes in analyte concentrations would influence their actions. These thresholds are used to calculate the probability of detecting changes, which defines the required analytical quality. The study provides a structured method to derive quality specifications from clinical needs. The findings suggest that quality requirements should be tailored to specific clinical scenarios. This approach ensures that laboratory measurements meet the standards necessary for accurate clinical decisions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is this test fit-for-purpose? Principles and a checklist for evaluating the clinical performance of a test in the new era of <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic (IVD) regulation.

Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences·2025
Same author

Low anterior resection syndrome in a Scandinavian population of patients with rectal cancer: a longitudinal follow-up within the QoLiRECT study.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2020
Same author

European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): within- and between-subject biological variation estimates of β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX), N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), osteocalcin, intact fibroblast growth factor 23 and uncarboxylated-unphosphorylated matrix-Gla protein-a cooperation between the EFLM Working Group on Biological Variation and the International Osteoporosis Foundation-International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Committee on Bone Metabolism.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Variation in the achievement of HbA<sub>1c</sub> , blood pressure and LDL cholesterol targets in type 2 diabetes in general practice and characteristics associated with risk factor control.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019
Same author

Factors associated with glycaemic control in adults with Type 1 diabetes: a registry-based analysis including 7601 individuals from 34 centres in Norway.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019
Same author

Systematic review of the biological variation data for diabetes related analytes.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2018

Area of Science:

  • Clinical chemistry
  • Medical decision-making
  • Analytical quality specifications

Background:

Clinical decisions often depend on accurate analytical measurements. However, the exact quality needed for these measurements remains unclear in many cases. Prior research has shown that physicians use laboratory data to guide treatment choices, but the specific quality requirements for these data have not been systematically defined. This gap motivated the development of a method to derive quality specifications from clinical needs. No prior work had resolved how to translate clinical decision points into measurable quality requirements. Physicians are typically asked to interpret test results, but their input into defining measurement standards is underutilized. Establishing a link between clinical relevance and analytical precision could improve diagnostic accuracy. This paper's contribution lies in its structured approach to extracting clinical knowledge for quality specification. The study aims to bridge the gap between clinical practice and laboratory standards.

Purpose Of The Study:

Keywords:
clinical decision thresholdsanalytical quality requirementslaboratory measurement standardsclinical knowledge extraction

Frequently Asked Questions

Physicians identify thresholds for analyte concentrations that influence their actions. These thresholds are used to calculate the probability of detecting changes.

Case histories are used to elicit clinical knowledge about analyte concentrations. Physicians provide decision points based on these scenarios.

Probability calculations determine the likelihood of detecting changes in analyte concentrations. This helps define the required analytical quality.

The study translates clinical decision points into measurable quality requirements. This ensures laboratory measurements meet clinical needs.

Related Experiment Videos

This study aims to determine the analytical quality required for clinical decisions by consulting physicians on their decision thresholds. The specific problem is the lack of a systematic method to translate clinical needs into measurable quality requirements. Physicians are uniquely positioned to identify when changes in analyte concentrations influence their actions. The motivation is to create a reproducible framework for deriving these quality specifications. By engaging clinicians in a structured process, the study seeks to define actionable thresholds for analytical accuracy. This approach allows for the calculation of quality requirements based on clinical relevance. The goal is to ensure that laboratory measurements meet the standards necessary for clinical decisions. This method could improve the alignment between laboratory practices and clinical outcomes.

Main Methods:

The study uses case histories to elicit clinical knowledge about analyte concentrations. Physicians are presented with hypothetical patient scenarios and asked about decision thresholds. These thresholds indicate when a change in concentration would alter clinical actions. The methodology requires strict construction of case histories to ensure consistency. Probability calculations are used to determine the detectability of these changes. The required analytical quality is derived from these probability estimates. The approach combines clinical judgment with statistical analysis to define quality specifications. This method ensures that quality requirements are directly linked to clinical needs.

Main Results:

Physicians provided thresholds for analyte concentrations that influence clinical decisions. These thresholds were used to calculate the probability of detecting changes in concentration. The study found that detectability depends on the magnitude of the concentration change. The required analytical quality was derived from these probability calculations. The results suggest that quality specifications must be tailored to specific clinical scenarios. The methodology successfully translated clinical needs into measurable quality requirements. The study demonstrated that physicians can accurately define decision points for analyte changes. These findings provide a framework for setting quality standards in clinical laboratories.

Conclusions:

The study concludes that physicians can define the analytical quality needed for clinical decisions. The methodology allows for the calculation of quality requirements based on clinical thresholds. The results show that detectability is linked to the magnitude of concentration changes. The approach provides a structured way to derive quality specifications from clinical needs. The study supports the use of case histories to extract clinical knowledge for quality standards. The findings suggest that quality requirements should be scenario-specific. The methodology ensures that quality specifications are directly relevant to clinical practice. These conclusions align with the authors' stated aim to bridge clinical and analytical standards.

Scenario-specific requirements ensure quality standards are directly relevant to clinical practice. This improves diagnostic accuracy.

The authors claim that physicians can define the analytical quality needed for clinical decisions. This is derived from their decision thresholds.