Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analytical quality, performance indices and laboratory service.

J Hilden1, E Magid

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. jh@kubism.ku.dk

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
|February 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Compliance with and short-term adverse events from clarithromycin versus placebo in patients with stable coronary heart disease: the CLARICOR trial.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2009
Same author

Increased urinary orosomucoid excretion: a proposed marker for inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2008
Same author

The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2008
Same author

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.

International journal of epidemiology·2007
Same author

Correction: interpretation of random effects meta-analysis in decision models.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2007
Same author

Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool in ruling out low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2007

Pure noise in diagnostic data has minor effects on performance indices. Unnoticed noise is twice as impactful as known noise, but resource allocation may be better spent on lab service quality.

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory medicine
  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Faulty data can compromise diagnostic and decision-making processes.
  • Analytical variance (noise) is a common data quality issue in laboratory settings.
  • The impact of unnoticed noise on diagnostic performance is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the effect of pure noise on diagnostic performance indices.
  • To compare the impact of unnoticed versus known noise on clinical decision-making.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of addressing noise versus improving other laboratory services.

Main Methods:

  • An idealized screening program was modeled.
  • The preventive benefit-to-cost ratio was used as the primary performance index.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulations assessed the impact of varying levels of known and unknown analytical variance.

    • Main Results:

    • Pure noise has minimal impact on clinically relevant diagnostic performance metrics.
    • Unnoticed noise approximately doubles the negative effect of known noise on performance.
    • The magnitude of these effects suggests noise correction may be less critical than other service aspects.

    Conclusions:

    • While data flaws impact diagnostics, pure noise has a limited effect on performance.
    • Managing known noise with adjusted decision limits is more effective than ignoring it.
    • Investing in laboratory timeliness, documentation, and interpretative support may offer greater clinical value than solely focusing on noise reduction.