Related Experiment Videos

Ototoxicity: an argument for evaluation of the cochlea in safety testing in animals

J L Mattsson1

  • 1Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, USA. jlmattsson@dowagro.com

Toxicologic Pathology
|February 11, 2000
PubMed

Insights

Current animal toxicity tests overlook the cochlea, a common target for toxins. Incorporating electrophysiologic methods like brain stem auditory evoked responses (BAERs) can effectively screen for ototoxicity.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Oto-toxicology
  • Auditory Science

Background:

  • The cochlea is a frequent target of toxic substances.
  • Standard toxicologic screening in animals does not routinely assess the cochlea.
  • Existing clinical examinations may miss ototoxicity due to species' ability to compensate for high-frequency hearing loss.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the deficiency in current toxicologic screening regarding cochlear toxicity.
  • To advocate for the inclusion of ototoxicity screening in safety tests for chemicals and drugs.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses histopathologic, behavioral, and electrophysiologic methods for ototoxicity assessment.
  • Highlights brain stem auditory evoked responses (BAERs) as a rapid and effective screening tool.
  • Mentions the feasibility of BAERs across mammalian species using subcutaneous electrodes and specific probe frequencies.

Main Results:

  • Routine toxicity studies often omit cochlear examination.
  • Ototoxicity can be missed in standard clinical evaluations.
  • BAERs provide a quick and reliable method for ototoxicity screening.

Conclusions:

  • Effective screening for ototoxicity is achievable using established methods, particularly BAERs.
  • The auditory system's importance necessitates the inclusion of ototoxicity screening in safety evaluations.
  • Chemical and drug safety testing should incorporate robust ototoxicity screening protocols.

Related Concept Videos