Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How can we learn about developmental processes from cross-sectional studies, or can we?

H C Kraemer1, J A Yesavage, J L Taylor

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5548, USA.

The American Journal of Psychiatry
|February 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Cross-sectional studies in psychiatric research can mislead longitudinal inferences. Researchers must use these findings cautiously, as factors like time scale and measurement reliability significantly impact developmental process conclusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Absence of evidence for bornavirus infection in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

Molecular psychiatry·2012
Same author

Simultaneous evaluation of the harms and benefits of treatments in randomized clinical trials: demonstration of a new approach.

Psychological medicine·2011
Same author

Who is really at risk? Identifying risk factors for subthreshold and full syndrome eating disorders in a high-risk sample.

Psychological medicine·2011
Same author

Predictors and moderators of time to remission of major depression with interpersonal psychotherapy and SSRI pharmacotherapy.

Psychological medicine·2010
Same author

Is late-onset schizophrenia a subtype of schizophrenia?

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2010
Same author

Interrater reliability of EEG-video monitoring.

Neurology·2009

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatric research methodology
  • Developmental psychology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cross-sectional studies are frequently employed in psychiatric research.
  • These studies are often used to make inferences about developmental or disease processes over time.
  • The limitations of inferring longitudinal trends from cross-sectional data are often underestimated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how cross-sectional study inferences can be misleading in psychiatric research.
  • To intuitively explain the mechanisms behind these inferential errors.
  • To provide guidance on recognizing and avoiding these errors in future research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simulated data inspired by real-world psychiatric research problems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstrated inferential errors on an intuitive level.
  • Identified key factors influencing the relationship between cross-sectional data and longitudinal inferences.

    • Main Results:

    • Four critical factors identified: time scale selection, developmental process type, measurement reliability, and terminology clarity.
    • Cross-sectional inferences about longitudinal processes can be seriously misleading.
    • Specific guidance is offered for recognizing and preventing inferential errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Longitudinal inferences drawn from cross-sectional studies should be approached with significant caution.
    • Understanding the limitations is crucial for accurate interpretation of psychiatric research findings.
    • Longitudinal studies are sometimes essential for answering critical research questions.