Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Promoter sequences and algorithmical methods for identifying them.

A Vanet1, L Marsan, M F Sagot

  • 1Institut de biologie physico-chimique, Paris, France.

Research in Microbiology
|February 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mitochondrial respiration and genomic analysis provide insight into the influence of the symbiotic bacterium on host trypanosomatid oxygen consumption.

Parasitology·2014
Same author

Algorithms for extracting structured motifs using a suffix tree with an application to promoter and regulatory site consensus identification.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2000
Same author

Inferring regulatory elements from a whole genome. An analysis of Helicobacter pylori sigma(80) family of promoter signals.

Journal of molecular biology·2000
Same author

An evolutionary analytical model of a complementary circular code.

Bio Systems·1999
Same author

Identifying satellites and periodic repetitions in biological sequences.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·1998
Same author

Evidence for specific secretion rather than autolysis in the release of some Helicobacter pylori proteins.

Infection and immunity·1998
Same journal

Deletion of major shell proteins of ethanolamine utilization microcompartment reduces intrinsic antibiotic resistance, biofilm, and intracellular survival of Salmonella Typhimurium.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Dynamic exometabolomics reveals metabolic adaptations of Staphylococcus epidermidis to pH-mimicking skin and bloodstream.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Co-expression network insights into Leptospira interrogans pathogenesis.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Differential DNA methylation associated with virulence attenuation in Edwardsiella piscicida.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced pneumonia: Pathogenesis, immune interactions, and antimicrobial resistance in a global context.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Investigating inhibitory effect of sterol targeting compounds against B. anthracis: Membrane microdomain a probable target.

Research in microbiology·2025
See all related articles

This study surveys mathematical models and algorithms for identifying promoter sequences in genomes. Emphasis is placed on prokaryotic promoter identification, with applications shown for bacteria.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Promoter sequences regulate gene transcription.
  • Accurate identification of promoter sequences is crucial for understanding gene regulation.
  • Existing computational methods vary in their applicability to different organisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive survey of mathematical models and algorithmic methods for promoter sequence identification.
  • To compare and contrast methods for both searching known consensus sequences and extracting novel consensus sequences.
  • To highlight methods particularly effective for prokaryotic promoter identification.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of existing computational approaches.
  • Categorization of methods based on their function (consensus searching vs. extraction).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of applicability to prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms.

    • Main Results:

    • A wide range of mathematical models and algorithms exist for promoter identification.
    • Methods are often specialized for either prokaryotes or eukaryotes, but some are adaptable.
    • Emphasis is given to methods suitable for prokaryotic promoter identification, with examples from bacterial datasets.

    Conclusions:

    • The field of computational promoter identification is diverse, offering various tools for genomic analysis.
    • Prokaryotic promoter identification benefits from specialized algorithms and tailored applications.
    • Further development and application of these methods are essential for advancing our understanding of gene regulation.