Subjective appraisal of problem severity and the ASI: secondary data or second opinion? Addiction Severity Index

The Addiction Severity Index is a popular research and clinical tool for the characterization of individuals grappling with substance abuse problems. For research, use of the seven objectively calculated composite scores of problem severity is recommended. In contrast, clinical use of the instrument relies more upon its subjectively derived interviewer and client severity rating scores. However, little systematic research has looked at the comparability of these two sources of client data. This study compared the objective and subjective scores of the ASI of male (n=141) and female (n=58) clients entering substance abuse treatment. In addition, clients' narratives about their most worrisome problems were recorded and put to content analyses. While significant correlations were found among the various subjective indices, little relationship could be discerned between the objective composite scores and any of the subjective indices derived from either the ASI or the clients' narratives. As the focus of outcome research shifts from objective client and treatment characteristics to a better understanding of the process of intervention, empirical characterization of substance abuse treatment outcome may be enriched by the inclusion of subjective data that taps into the client's own perceptions of problems and treatment efficacy in addition to more objective sources of data.