Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Slow discrimination of contrast-defined expansion patterns.

H A Allen1, A M Derrington

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK. ipxhaa@psychology.nottingham.ac.uk

Vision Research
|February 23, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Visual perception of motion differs based on how stimuli are defined. Luminance-defined motion is processed faster than contrast-defined motion, impacting real-time navigation capabilities.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High proportion of rare and compound epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in an Australian population of non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Internal medicine journal·2014
Same author

Two-dimensional pattern motion analysis uses local features.

Vision research·2012
Same author

Previewing distracters reduces their effective contrast.

Vision research·2007
Same author

A psychophysical investigation into the preview benefit in visual search.

Vision research·2007
Same author

The effect of stimulus height on visual discrimination in horses.

Journal of animal science·2003
Same author

Behaviour of marmoset monkeys in a T-maze: comparison with rats and macaque monkeys on a spatial delayed non-match to sample task.

Experimental brain research·2003

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Motion processing
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Human observers perform complex motion discrimination tasks.
  • Stimuli can be defined by luminance or contrast variations.
  • Understanding processing speed differences is crucial for visual neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare human performance in motion discrimination tasks using luminance-defined versus contrast-defined stimuli.
  • To investigate the impact of stimulus duration on discrimination accuracy.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of visual motion processing.

Main Methods:

  • Observers discriminated between centered and distorted expansion patterns.
  • Stimuli were composed of patches moving outwards or inwards.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was measured as a function of stimulus duration (200 ms to over 2 s).

    • Main Results:

    • Luminance-defined patterns allowed 75% correct discrimination at 200 ms.
    • Contrast-defined patterns required over 2 s to reach the same performance level.
    • Task strategy shifted to searching for specific motion patterns with contrast-defined stimuli, unlike luminance-defined ones.

    Conclusions:

    • Contrast-defined motion signals are processed significantly slower than luminance-defined signals.
    • Slow processing of contrast-defined patterns may hinder real-time navigation reliant on optic flow.
    • Sequential processing of local motion signals may contribute to delays in contrast-defined pattern perception.