Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interventions to increase breast screening uptake: do they make any difference?

J P Sin1, A S St Leger

  • 1Department of Public Health and Health Promotion, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.

Journal of Medical Screening
|February 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of anaesthetic agents on induction, recovery and patient preferences in adult day case surgery: a 7-day follow-up randomized controlled trial.

European journal of anaesthesiology·2008
Same author

Are GP practice prescribing rates for coronary heart disease drugs equitable? A cross sectional analysis in four primary care trusts in England.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2004
Same author

Clinical and economic choices in anaesthesia for day surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Anaesthesia·2003
Same author

Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day-case surgery: induction and recovery characteristics.

British journal of anaesthesia·2003
Same author

Developing prevalence-based prescribing units for analysing variations in general practitioner prescribing: a case study using statins.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2003
Same author

Screening for cognitive impairment in older African-Caribbeans.

Psychological medicine·2000
Same journal

Cost-benefit analysis of an organized community-based multi-cancer screening program in Bangladesh.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Response to: Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination with a more plausible assumption.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Response to Takahashi regarding Bestwick and Wald: Mischaracterisation of evidence in prostate cancer screening.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

No-cost envelope modification improves fecal immunochemical test laboratory acceptance in a US Veterans Affairs colorectal cancer screening trial.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Prostate cancer screening: The level of the evidence hierarchy.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Prediction model to prioritize colorectal cancer screening with visual colonoscopy.

Journal of medical screening·2026
See all related articles

Simple interventions effectively boost breast cancer screening uptake. Brief, person-directed strategies are most successful, with multistrategy approaches beneficial for urban areas.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Cancer Screening
  • Health Intervention Research

Background:

  • Breast screening is crucial for early breast cancer detection and improved survival rates.
  • Increasing screening uptake, especially in underserved areas, enhances national program effectiveness.
  • This review identifies successful initiatives aimed at boosting screening participation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of various interventions designed to increase breast screening uptake.
  • To identify which types of interventions are most successful in promoting participation in breast screening programs.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review was conducted on interventions promoting breast screening uptake.
  • Studies were included if they measured uptake as an outcome and were relevant to the UK screening program.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Interventions were categorized into person-directed, system-directed, social network-directed, and multistrategy approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Twenty-eight studies were analyzed, with most interventions being person-directed.
    • Person-directed interventions were more likely to be effective, simple, and evaluated via randomized trials.
    • Limited evidence exists for the effectiveness of system-directed, social network-directed, and multistrategy interventions due to study numbers and designs.

    Conclusions:

    • Simple and brief interventions are effective in increasing breast screening uptake.
    • Complex interventions are not necessarily more effective than simpler ones.
    • Multistrategy approaches may be optimal for increasing uptake in inner-city populations, with implications for other population-based screening programs.