Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Development and validation of the Validity Indicator Profile.

R I Frederick1, R D Crosby

  • 1Department of Psychology, U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, Missouri 65807, USA. rfrederi@ipa.net

Law and Human Behavior
|February 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Daily self-weighing compared with an active control causes greater negative affective lability in emerging adult women: A randomized trial.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2023
Same author

Yoga's impact on risk and protective factors for disordered eating: a pilot prevention trial.

Eating disorders·2020
Same author

Health-related quality of life in randomized controlled trials of lorcaserin for obesity management: what mediates improvement?

Clinical obesity·2017
Same author

A randomised controlled trial of three psychological treatments for anorexia nervosa.

Psychological medicine·2017
Same author

Cognitive dysfunction predicts poorer emotion recognition in bariatric surgery candidates.

Obesity science & practice·2016
Same author

Eating disorder behaviours amongst adolescents: investigating classification, persistence and prospective associations with adverse outcomes using latent class models.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2016
Same journal

Viewing police body-worn camera video of use-of-force incidents: Does repeated or slow-motion viewing matter?

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

Psychopathy in the context of adversity: Understanding associations of early-life adversity and psychopathic symptoms in a sample of justice-involved youth.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

Race and ethnicity in the courtroom workgroup: Can diversifying the court solve racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes?

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

The justice motive: Retributive and restorative factors affect public evaluations of child protection.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

A risk-need-responsivity (RNR)-informed systematic review of needs during the pretrial period.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

When we do not care about what happens to "criminals": How character judgments influence indifference to incidental suffering in the criminal justice system.

Law and human behavior·2026
See all related articles

The Validity Indicator Profile (VIP) helps detect invalid cognitive test results due to malingering. This tool assesses response styles to ensure test validity in neuropsychological evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Forensic Psychology

Background:

  • Cognitive and neuropsychological assessments are crucial for evaluating an individual's capacities.
  • Malingering and problematic response styles can compromise the validity of test results.
  • The Validity Indicator Profile (VIP) was developed to address these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the Validity Indicator Profile (VIP) as a tool to detect invalid performance in cognitive and neuropsychological testing.
  • To differentiate between compliant, careless, irrelevant, and malingering response styles.
  • To assess the accuracy of the VIP in classifying test performance as valid or invalid.

Main Methods:

  • The VIP is a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) procedure with 100 nonverbal abstraction problems and 78 word-definition problems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It was developed and cross-validated on diverse samples, including nonclinical participants and individuals undergoing neuropsychological evaluation.
  • Performance classification includes 'compliant' (valid), 'careless' (low effort, correct), 'irrelevant' (low effort, incorrect), and 'malingering' (high effort, incorrect).

    • Main Results:

    • The nonverbal subtest achieved an overall classification rate of 79.8% (73.5% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity).
    • The verbal subtest achieved an overall classification rate of 75.5% (67.3% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity).
    • These results indicate the VIP's utility in identifying problematic response styles.

    Conclusions:

    • The VIP is a valuable instrument for identifying invalid performance in cognitive and neuropsychological assessments.
    • It effectively distinguishes between various response styles, aiding in the interpretation of test results.
    • The VIP contributes to ensuring the representativeness of assessed capacities.