Related Experiment Videos
How to measure the information gained from one symbol.
1The Salk Institute, Sloan Center, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. deweese@salk.edu
Summary
Researchers found a flaw in how neural information is measured, as it doesn't add up correctly. They propose a new, additive measure for neuronal response information, crucial for understanding brain codes.
Area of Science:
- Computational Neuroscience
- Information Theory
- Systems Neuroscience
Background:
- Information theory is widely used to quantify neuronal representation of stimuli and behavior.
- A key question is determining the information conveyed by neuronal responses.
- Current methods for measuring accumulated information in neural activity lack additivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and address the non-additive flaw in the commonly used measure of neuronal information.
- To propose and validate a novel, additive measure for information per neuronal observation.
- To re-interpret existing findings on neural coding using the new additive measure.
Main Methods:
- Theoretical analysis of information measures in the context of neural coding.
- Development of a new definition for information per observation that guarantees additivity.
- Empirical validation using electrophysiological recordings of visual responses from primate cortical neurons.
Main Results:
- The standard definition of accumulated information in neural activity is shown to be non-additive.
- A unique, additive measure for information per observation is derived and proven.
- Application to primate visual cortex data reveals distinct interpretations of neural coding efficiency.
Conclusions:
- The proposed additive measure is the only definition satisfying this critical property for analyzing population codes.
- The findings suggest that neurons, particularly those studied in primate visual cortex, operate substantially below their theoretical information capacity.
- This work provides a more accurate framework for quantifying information processing in the brain.