Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous?
1Office of Graduate Studies, Villanova University, PA 19085, USA. glong@email.vill.edu
Abstract:
The role of bottom-up processes in our perception of reversible figures was examined. In Experiment 1 the overlapping squares figure and nonsense reversible figures were used. The effects of adapting subjects for differing durations to an unambiguous version of the figure before presentation of the traditional reversible figure were determined under conditions of varying precision of fixation. In Experiment 2 the research was expanded to other examples of reversible figures. In both experiments, results with two dependent measures (the subject's first percept and the number of reversals reported) were generally consistent with the interpretation of bottom-up processes underlying the adaptation effects. However, the crucial role of stimulus and procedural variables and the differential sensitivity of the two dependent measures was demonstrated.
Related Concept Videos
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Conservative Forces
Diode: Reverse bias
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Indeterminate Products
Indeterminate Forms and L’Hôpital’s Rule

