A laser-based method for measuring thermal nociception of cattle

We describe a method for measuring nociception in cattle using a CO(2) laser aimed at the caudal aspect of the metatarsi. In Experiment 1, infrared thermography showed that calves responded by lifting their legs when skin temperatures reached 45-55 degrees C. In Experiment 2a, the validity of the method was tested by comparing the response latencies of 14 calves to two power settings (2.25 W vs. 4.5 W) with each setting being applied six times. We found that both leg-lift latencies and tail-flick latencies were lower at the higher power setting, and the calves were more likely to respond by kicking than by simply moving the leg. The standard deviations between and within calves were smaller at the higher power setting, and the large within-calf variation means that at least three tests were required to obtain reliable measures that could differentiate between calves. In Experiment 2b, application of the laser at a range of power settings (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0 and 5.5 W) on 16 calves showed that response latencies decreased as power increased up to 4.5 W, after which no further change occurred. In Experiment 3, the repeatability of the method was evaluated on nine measures with the high power setting (4.5 W). The coefficient of variation associated with repetition of the measures was 36%. In general, we found little change in response latencies with repeated use of the laser, except that responses on the second test tended to be shorter. Experiment 4 showed that ambient temperatures between 16 degrees C and 27 degrees C did not affect response latencies, but these were longer at temperatures of 7 degrees C. We suggest that the method is a useful way of measuring cattle's sensitivity to nociception as the animals need not be restrained and the distance to the animal need not be closely controlled. However, to obtain accurate, valid and reliable measures it is necessary to use a high power setting (4.5 W) and take at least three consecutive measures of the response latency.