Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios.

B J Biggerstaff1

  • 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, P. O. Box 2087, Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-2087, USA. bkb5@cdc.gov

Statistics in Medicine
|March 4, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimated US Trends in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibody Concentrations and Correlation to Risk of First-Time Infections Based on Blood Donations, 2022.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Incidence of West Nile virus infection in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area during the 2012 epidemic.

Epidemiology and infection·2016
Same author

Use of laboratory reports as predictors of West Nile virus disease cases, Texas, 2008-2012.

Epidemiology and infection·2014
Same author

Vector competence of Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae) from two regions of Chicago with low and high prevalence of West Nile virus human infections.

Journal of medical entomology·2012
Same author

Estimated cumulative incidence of West Nile virus infection in US adults, 1999-2010.

Epidemiology and infection·2012
Same author

Transmission dynamics of primary pneumonic plague in the USA.

Epidemiology and infection·2011

This study introduces a novel graphic for comparing diagnostic tests, enhancing the interpretation of likelihood ratios beyond traditional sensitivity and specificity metrics. The graphic aids in understanding test performance and making informed clinical decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Traditional comparison of diagnostic tests relies on sensitivity and specificity, or summaries like Youden's index.
  • Likelihood ratios offer a more appropriate, though less intuitive, method for comparing diagnostic test performance.
  • Existing methods may not fully capture nuanced differences in test accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a simple graphic for comparing two or more diagnostic tests.
  • To incorporate and facilitate the interpretation of likelihood ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
  • To provide a decision-theoretic basis for interpreting diagnostic test comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel graphical tool for diagnostic test comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing likelihood ratios to demonstrate test performance nuances.
  • Relating the graphic to the tent graph framework for decision-theoretic interpretation.
  • Application to a comparative example of serodiagnostic tests for Lyme disease.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed graphic allows for easy interpretation of multiple diagnostic measures.
    • Demonstration that a test can outperform another in predictive values despite lower sensitivity or specificity.
    • The graphic provides a visual aid for understanding the trade-offs in diagnostic test performance.
    • The method is applicable to comparing multiple diagnostic tests simultaneously.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel graphic enhances the comparison of diagnostic tests by integrating likelihood ratios and traditional metrics.
    • It facilitates a more intuitive understanding of test performance, including scenarios where predictive values differ despite variations in sensitivity or specificity.
    • This approach offers a valuable tool for researchers and clinicians in selecting optimal diagnostic strategies, as illustrated by the Lyme disease example.