Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimization of extraction conditions for low-molecular-weight analytes using solid-phase microextraction

Shirey1

  • 1Supelco Inc., Supelco Park, PA 16823, USA.

Journal of Chromatographic Science
|March 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Six solid-phase microextraction fiber coatings were tested for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) under 90 molecular weight. Analyte recovery was evaluated, considering pH, ionic strength, and extraction techniques for optimal results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimization of extraction conditions and fiber selection for semivolatile analytes using solid-phase microextraction

Journal of chromatographic science·2000
Same author

Osmium Recycling in Subduction Zones

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are prevalent in various environmental and industrial samples.
  • Efficient extraction of low molecular weight VOCs is crucial for accurate analysis.
  • Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a versatile technique for sample preparation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiency of six different SPME fiber coatings for extracting volatile analytes (<90 molecular weight).
  • To investigate the impact of sample modifiers (pH, ionic strength) on analyte recovery.
  • To compare headspace and immersion SPME techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Extraction of 11 classes of volatile organic analytes using six distinct SPME fiber coatings under identical conditions.
  • Analysis of analyte amounts recovered by each fiber.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic variation of sample pH and ionic strength.
  • Comparison between headspace and immersion extraction methodologies.

    • Main Results:

    • Quantification of analyte recovery across different SPME fiber coatings.
    • Demonstration of the influence of pH and ionic strength on analyte extraction efficiency.
    • Comparative data on the performance of headspace versus immersion extraction.

    Conclusions:

    • Specific SPME fiber coatings show differential efficacy for extracting low molecular weight volatile organic compounds.
    • Sample matrix conditions, including pH and ionic strength, significantly affect extraction recovery.
    • Headspace and immersion SPME techniques offer distinct advantages depending on the analytes and sample matrix.