Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating frequency proximity in stream segregation.

K L Baker1, S M Williams, R I Nicolson

  • 1Department of Human Communication, De Montfort University, Leicester, England. klb@dmu.ac.uk

Perception & Psychophysics
|March 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect on compression of lowering the design adiabat in the SQ-n campaign.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Ultra-fast single-crystal CVD diamonds in the particle time-of-flight (PTOF) detector for low yield burn-history measurements on the NIF (invited).

The Review of scientific instruments·2025
Same author

The impact of low-mode symmetry on inertial fusion energy output in the burning plasma state.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Design of the first fusion experiment to achieve target energy gain G>1.

Physical review. E·2024
Same author

Observations and properties of the first laboratory fusion experiment to exceed a target gain of unity.

Physical review. E·2024
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Auditory streams are formed by sounds close in frequency. This study found the perception of frequency proximity is not based on logarithmic, cochlear, or Mel scales, suggesting a unique metric for auditory grouping.

Area of Science:

  • Psychoacoustics
  • Auditory Perception
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Consecutive sounds with similar structure and close frequency are perceived as a single auditory stream.
  • This phenomenon is known as frequency proximity, but the exact metric for judging frequency differences in complex auditory scenes remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the metric governing frequency proximity in auditory perception.
  • To determine how frequency differences are evaluated when grouping sounds into perceptual sequences (auditory streams).

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments used repeating three-tone stimulus patterns presented at a rate typically inducing two auditory streams.
  • The frequency of a middle tone was varied, and subjects reported its perceived stream allocation on a 5-point scale.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli were presented both synchronously and sequentially to compare auditory grouping under different temporal conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • The point of equal probability for the middle tone joining either the high or low frequency stream was lower than predicted by logarithmic, cochlear, or Mel scale midpoints.
    • This indicates that the metric for frequency proximity is not directly derived from these common scales.
    • Synchronous presentation of high and low tones resulted in a lower midpoint than sequential presentation, suggesting additional factors influence auditory stream formation beyond simple frequency proximity.

    Conclusions:

    • The perception of frequency proximity in auditory stream formation does not align with standard psychoacoustic scales.
    • Auditory grouping is influenced by factors beyond just the frequency difference between sounds.
    • The temporal relationship (synchronous vs. sequential presentation) between tones significantly impacts the perceived auditory stream segregation.