Ureters
Anatomy of the Genitourinary System I: Kidneys and Ureters
Anatomy of the Genitourinary System II: Bladder and Urethra
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

A Murine Model of Irreversible and Reversible Unilateral Ureteric Obstruction
Published on: December 20, 2014
J S Pandya1, P P Shilotri, R R Satoskar
1Department Of General Surgery, T.N. Medical College, Mumbai.
This case study describes a rare anatomical condition called a circumcaval ureter. The condition was diagnosed preoperatively using intravenous pyelography, where a 'fish-hook' appearance was observed. The patient underwent surgical correction using Anderson Hones pyeloplasty, with the retrocaval segment of the ureter left in place. The study highlights the importance of recognizing this imaging feature to guide surgical planning. The authors suggest that the 'fish-hook' sign may serve as a reliable diagnostic indicator for this rare condition.
06:05Assessing Urinary Tract Junction Obstruction Defects by Methylene Blue Dye Injection
Published on: October 12, 2017
06:39Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Published on: November 22, 2019
Area of Science:
Background:
Anomalous renal anatomy can lead to obstructive uropathy, a condition that may require surgical correction. Prior research has shown that retrocaval ureters are rare congenital anomalies. However, diagnostic challenges remain in identifying these anomalies before surgery. Established imaging techniques like intravenous pyelography have been used to detect ureteral anomalies. No prior work had resolved the exact preoperative visualization of circumcaval ureters using this method. This gap motivated the need for clearer diagnostic approaches. That uncertainty drove the search for imaging features that could reliably suggest the anomaly. No prior work had demonstrated the 'fish-hook' sign as a diagnostic clue. This uncertainty prompted further investigation into preoperative imaging accuracy.
Purpose Of The Study:
This case study aimed to describe a rare anatomical variant, the circumcaval ureter, and its preoperative diagnosis. The specific problem addressed was the lack of clear diagnostic markers for this anomaly. The motivation stemmed from the need to improve preoperative planning in urological surgery. The study sought to demonstrate the utility of intravenous pyelography in identifying the anomaly. The goal was to confirm the anomaly's presence without invasive diagnostics. The researchers proposed that the 'fish-hook' sign could serve as a reliable diagnostic indicator. This approach could reduce the risk of intraoperative surprises. The study aimed to provide a case example of successful surgical management.
Main Methods:
The study involved a single patient diagnosed with a circumcaval ureter. Intravenous pyelography was used to visualize the urinary tract. The 'fish-hook' appearance was noted as a key diagnostic feature. The patient underwent surgical correction via Anderson Hones pyeloplasty. The retrocaval segment of the ureter was left in place during the procedure. No additional diagnostic tools like CT scans or MRI were mentioned in the abstract. The surgical approach was guided by preoperative imaging findings. The outcome of the procedure was not detailed in the abstract.
Main Results:
The circumcaval ureter was diagnosed preoperatively using intravenous pyelography. The 'fish-hook' appearance was identified as a characteristic finding. The patient underwent Anderson Hones pyeloplasty successfully. The retrocaval segment of the ureter was left in situ during surgery. No complications were reported in the abstract. The preoperative imaging findings were confirmed during the surgical procedure. The study demonstrated the feasibility of diagnosing the anomaly preoperatively. The 'fish-hook' sign proved to be a reliable diagnostic indicator.
Conclusions:
The authors proposed that the 'fish-hook' appearance on intravenous pyelography may suggest a circumcaval ureter. They emphasized the importance of recognizing this imaging feature preoperatively. The study demonstrated that surgical correction is possible without removing the retrocaval segment. The findings may help in planning surgical interventions for similar cases. The authors suggested that this imaging finding could aid in avoiding intraoperative complications. The study did not propose new surgical techniques or imaging modalities. The approach described may be useful in diagnosing rare anatomical variants. The authors did not claim this method is superior to other imaging techniques.
The 'fish-hook' appearance on intravenous pyelography may suggest a circumcaval ureter, according to the authors.
The patient underwent Anderson Hones pyeloplasty, leaving the retrocaval segment in place.
The retrocaval segment was left in situ as part of the Anderson Hones pyeloplasty procedure.
Intravenous pyelography was used to identify the circumcaval ureter preoperatively.
A circumcaval ureter is characterized by the ureter looping behind the inferior vena cava.
The authors proposed that the 'fish-hook' sign may be a reliable diagnostic indicator for circumcaval ureters.