Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing.

E Gibson1, N J Pearlmutter

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachussetts Institute of Technology Cambridge 02139, USA. gibson@psyche.mit.edu

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
|March 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-biopsy of fibroadenomas in the UK and Ireland: a British Society of Breast Radiology survey of national practice.

Clinical radiology·2025
Same author

First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Interactive 3D U-net for the segmentation of the pancreas in computed tomography scans.

Physics in medicine and biology·2020
Same author

Higher risk breast screening: cancer detection rates, recall rates, and attendance rates in Northern Ireland.

Clinical radiology·2019
Same author

"It was the whole picture" a mixed methods study of successful components in an integrated wellness service in North East England.

BMC health services research·2018
Same author

Embedded research: a promising way to create evidence-informed impact in public health?

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2018

This study explores whether the human language parser operates serially or in parallel. It challenges existing parallel models and suggests new experimental methods for investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Computational Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Investigating the human language parsing mechanism: serial vs. parallel processing.
  • Examining counterclaims against ranked parallel models regarding structural interpretation availability.
  • Addressing predictions of parallel models on processing slowdowns in syntactically ambiguous structures.

Discussion:

  • Evaluating the impact of disambiguating material on structural interpretation availability.
  • Analyzing the plausibility of secondary structures within ambiguous regions.
  • Proposing reaction time distribution analysis as an experimental method.

Key Insights:

  • Challenges Lewis's (2000) claims about parallel parsing models.
  • Highlights the role of disambiguating material in parsing models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Suggests novel experimental approaches to differentiate serial and parallel parsing.

    • Outlook:

    • Further experimental validation of proposed methods.
    • Refining computational models of human sentence processing.
    • Deeper understanding of cognitive mechanisms underlying language comprehension.