Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new volume ventilator

A three phase laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new fluidically controlled volume ventilator (Ohio 550) was undertaken to determine if this more compact, less complex and less costly unit retained the multiple advantages which have been established for volume ventilators in the continuous ventilatory support of patients in respiratory failure. Inspired volume, peak pressure, and flow rates were continuously monitored while a "test lung" was ventilated with its "effective compliance" reduced, and ambulatory patients with varying degrees of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory impairment were ventilated with the 550 respirator. Since adequate tidal and minute volumes were achieved under these conditions of markedly altered breathing mechanics, ten patients in acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation were managed with the 550 respirator. Aside from the absence of a sighing device, not considered by the authors to be a major disadvantage, the mechanical characteristics, inspired oxygen control and alarm systems were judged satisfactory and compared favorably with the volume ventilators currently available. The fluidic control system is expected to enhance the reliability and minimize the maintenance required of this respirator.