Related Experiment Videos
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the immune responses induced by a multivalent minigene DNA vaccine
L L An1, F Rodriguez, S Harkins
1Department of Neuropharmacology, CVN-9, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Abstract:
Vaccines containing minigenes - isolated antigenic epitopes encoded by short open reading frames - can, under certain circumstances, confer protective immunity upon the vaccinee. Here we evaluate the efficacy of the minigene vaccine approach using DNA immunization and find that, to be immunogenic, a minigene-encoded epitope requires a perfect "Kozak" translational initiation region. In addition, using intracellular cytokine staining, we show that immunization with a plasmid encoding a full-length protein induces epitope-specific CD8(+) T cells which are detectable directly ex vivo, and constitute approximately 2% of the vaccinee's splenic CD8(+) T cells. In contrast, such cells are undetectable directly ex vivo in recipients of a minigene vaccine. Nevertheless, the minigene plasmid does induce a low number of epitope-specific CD8(+) T cells, which can be amplified to detectable levels by in vivo stimulation. Indeed, 4 days after in vivo stimulation (by virus infection), all vaccinated mice - regardless of whether they had been vaccinated with the minigene or with the full-length gene - had similar numbers of epitope-specific CD8(+) T cells. However, despite these strong responses at 4 days post-infection, recipients of the minigene vaccine showed no enhanced ability to limit virus replication and dissemination. We therefore observe a dichotomy; minigene vaccinees are not protected, despite the presence of strong virus-specific immune responses at 4 days post-challenge. We suggest that the protective benefits of vaccination exert themselves very soon - perhaps within minutes or hours - after virus challenge. If the vaccine-induced immune response is too low to achieve this early protective effect, virus-specific T cells will expand rapidly, but ineffectually, leading to the strong but non-protective response measured at 4 days post-infection. Thus, vaccine-induced immunity should be monitored very early in infection, since the extent to which these responses may later be amplified is largely irrelevant to the protection observed.