Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hormesis: policy implications.

L B Lave1

  • 1Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA.

Journal of Applied Toxicology : JAT
|March 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health benefits of abating air pollution.

Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·2009
Same author

A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2001
Same author

Hormesis: implications for public policy regarding toxicants.

Annual review of public health·2001
Same author

Effect of the fine fraction of particulate matter versus the coarse mass and other pollutants on daily mortality in Santiago, Chile.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2000
Same author

Risk analysis and management of dam safety.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1998
Same author

Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation?

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996

Hormesis, a biological phenomenon, suggests low toxicant exposure benefits health, potentially shifting regulatory policy from

Area of Science:

  • Environmental toxicology
  • Regulatory science
  • Public health policy

Background:

  • Public policy prioritizes protecting workers and the public from toxic chemicals, especially carcinogens.
  • Uncertainty in chemical toxicity and dose-response relationships leads to the precautionary principle in regulation.
  • The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses 'mechanism of action' for setting regulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the potential of hormesis to inform regulatory policy for toxic chemicals.
  • To examine how hormesis challenges the current 'no-risk' regulatory model.
  • To propose a shift towards a 'risk-risk' model balancing public health benefits and risks.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of hormesis in toxicology and regulatory science.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of the 'no-risk' model with the 'risk-risk' model informed by hormesis.
  • Evaluation of the implications of hormesis for public health policy and risk assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Hormesis suggests low-level toxicant exposure may offer health benefits to the general population.
    • This contrasts with current policies that assume no benefit and aim for minimal exposure.
    • Hormesis could enable a 'risk-risk' approach, tolerating higher exposures than the 'no-risk' Delaney Clause-like model.

    Conclusions:

    • Hormesis, if scientifically validated, could fundamentally alter toxic chemical regulation.
    • A 'risk-risk' framework could balance benefits for the majority against risks to the immune-compromised.
    • This paradigm shift may allow for more pragmatic and potentially less costly regulatory standards.