Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interference in visual working memory.

J McConnell1, J G Quinn

  • 1University of St Andrews, Fife, U.K.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|March 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perception of medical imaging educators on the addition of AI education to the medical imaging curriculum: A cross-sectional survey.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2025
Same author

Research culture, barriers and facilitators within the radiography workforce in the UK - results of a national survey.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2025
Same author

Integrating AI into medical imaging curricula: Insights from UK HEIs.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2025
Same author

Radiographer Education and Learning in Artificial Intelligence (REAL-AI): A survey of radiographers, radiologists, and students' knowledge of and attitude to education on AI.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024
Same author

Impact of a digital training platform and tailored education on the chest image interpretation performance of healthcare professionals.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024
Same author

A scoping review of educational programmes on artificial intelligence (AI) available to medical imaging staff.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

This study reveals how irrelevant visual stimuli interfere with working memory. Static visual noise does not disrupt tasks, unlike dynamic noise, due to decay.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Working memory comprises a passive visual store and an active spatial rehearsal mechanism.
  • Understanding interference in the visuo-spatial component of working memory (VSSP) is crucial for cognitive function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which visual fields access the passive visual store.
  • To determine the factors causing irrelevant visual fields to interfere with concurrent visual processing.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Contrasted dynamic and static visual noise fields during a visual task.
  • Experiment 2: Examined the decay properties of static visual noise.
  • Experiment 3: Manipulated the number of changes in dynamic visual noise fields.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Static visual noise did not interfere with concurrent visual tasks, unlike dynamic noise.
  • The lack of interference from static noise was attributed to its susceptibility to decay.
  • The degree of interference from dynamic visual noise was dependent on the number of changes within the noise field.

Conclusions:

  • The characteristics of the visuo-spatial component of working memory (VSSP) were further elucidated.
  • Decay mechanisms play a significant role in preventing interference from static visual stimuli.
  • Dynamic visual noise interferes with visual processing, with interference intensity related to the noise's variability.