Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Proprioception and stimulus-response compatibility.

C J Worringham¹, G K Kerr

¹School of Human Movement Studies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. C.Worringham@qut.edu.au

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology

|March 16, 2000

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Increased short interval intracortical inhibition in participants with previous hamstring strain injury.

European journal of applied physiology·2021

Same author

Impacts of dance on cognition, psychological symptoms and quality of life in Parkinson's disease.

NeuroRehabilitation·2019

Same author

Nutritional status in Parkinson's disease patients undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery: a pilot study.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2013

Same author

Enhanced somatosensory information decreases postural sway in older people.

Gait & posture·2012

Same author

Predictors of future falls in Parkinson disease.

Neurology·2010

Same author

Electromyographic activity in lower limb muscles is temporally associated with the slow phase of oxygen uptake during cycling.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2009

Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005

Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005

Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005

Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005

Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005

Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005

See all related articles

This study on stimulus-response compatibility found that reaction times are faster for compatible hand-stimulus pairings. Proprioceptive cues, not just visual or tactile, are crucial for determining hand position and guiding responses.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Human Factors
Neuroscience

Background:

Stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) tasks investigate the relationship between stimulus location and response execution.
Previous research indicates reaction time (RT) advantages for compatible stimulus-response mappings.
The role of proprioception in mediating SRC, especially with crossed versus uncrossed hand positions, requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine how finger separation and hand crossing influence reaction time in a lateralized visual stimulus task.
To investigate the contribution of proprioceptive information versus automatic limb activation in stimulus-response compatibility.
To determine the neural mechanisms underlying response selection in complex motor tasks.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

Sixteen participants performed a key-pressing task responding to lateralized visual stimuli.
Conditions included uncrossed and crossed hand configurations with varying finger separations.
Proprioceptive judgments of relative finger positions were collected independently.

Main Results:

A reaction time advantage was observed for compatible instructions and uncrossed hand positions.
Decreasing finger separation reduced the compatibility effect and increased bilateral hand responses.
The compatibility effect vanished at a specific crossed position, independent of proprioceptive difficulty.

Conclusions:

Response selection involves a summation of automatic, same-side limb activation and integrated, rule-based processing.
Proprioceptive cues, even without tactile contact, are sufficient to guide response selection in SRC tasks.
Findings suggest distinct neural pathways for automatic and controlled response processes.