Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.

M Schmitt1, A Postma, E De Haan

  • 1Utrecht University, The Netherlands. M.Schmitt@fss.uu.nl

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|March 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Femoral Neck System versus the Dynamic Hip Screw in patients with a femoral neck fracture: 2-year follow-up of a multicenter study.

Injury·2025
Same author

Gastrointestinal and eating problems in SCN1A-related seizure disorders.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B·2023
Same author

Printability and bio-functionality of a shear thinning methacrylated xanthan-gelatin composite bioink.

Biofabrication·2021
Same author

Neural correlates of egocentric and allocentric frames of reference combined with metric and non-metric spatial relations.

Neuroscience·2019
Same author

Mediating Mechanisms in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood OCD: The Role of Dysfunctional Beliefs.

Child psychiatry and human development·2018
Same author

Eight-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with surgical stripping of the great saphenous vein.

The British journal of surgery·2018
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Spatial attention mechanisms are modality-specific yet interactive. Cross-modal cueing effects in visual and auditory attention depend on the task, with some effects task-dependent.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Exogenous spatial attention is crucial for processing sensory information.
  • Understanding cross-modal interactions in attention is key to cognitive models.
  • Posner's cueing paradigm is a standard method for studying spatial attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cross-modality in exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
  • To examine the influence of task type (detection, localization, discrimination) on attentional cueing.
  • To explore modality-specific versus interacting attention mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Employed Posner's cueing paradigm across six experiments.
  • Utilized detection, localization, and up/down discrimination tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied cue modality (visual, auditory) and target modality (visual, auditory).

    • Main Results:

    • Cross-modal cueing observed in detection and localization tasks, but not consistently across all conditions.
    • Inhibition of return was primarily within-modality specific.
    • Cue validity influenced performance mainly in localization tasks.
    • Task-dependent cueing effects were noted, particularly in discrimination tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • Attention mechanisms appear to be modality-specific but also interact across modalities.
    • The interplay between modality-specific and cross-modal attention is influenced by task demands.
    • Findings suggest a complex architecture for spatial attention processing.