Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods.

F J Rohlf1

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5245, USA. rohlf@life.bio.sunysb.edu

American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|March 23, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The evolution of mammalian brain size.

Science advances·2021
Same author

Testing species' deviation from allometric predictions using the phylogenetic regression.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2016
Same author

Criteria for the evaluation of alternative environmental monitoring variables: Theory and an application using winter flounder (Pleuronectes americanus) and Dover sole (Microstomus pacificus).

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2013
Same author

Combining geometric morphometrics, molecular phylogeny, and micropaleontology to assess evolutionary patterns in Mallomonas (Synurophyceae: Heterokontophyta).

Geobiology·2013
Same author

Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape.

Systematic biology·2002
Same author

Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2002
Same journal

A geometric morphometric assessment of shape variation in adult pelvic morphology.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the non-obstetric pelvis across anthropoids.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

The biological index of frailty: A new index for the assessment of frailty in human skeletal remains.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Mass violence in Copper Age Europe: The massacre burial site from Potočani, Croatia.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Skeletal evidence of structural violence among undocumented migrants from Mexico and Central America.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Technical note: Artificial Resynthesis Technology for the experimental formation of dental microwear textures.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
See all related articles

Goodall's F-test demonstrated the highest statistical power for testing shape equality in populations. Other methods like T(2)-tests showed variable power depending on coordinate systems and triangle shape, with some methods exhibiting low power and incorrect error rates.

Area of Science:

  • Biometrics
  • Statistical Shape Analysis
  • Geometric Morphometrics

Background:

  • Shape analysis is crucial in biology and paleontology.
  • Various statistical tests exist to compare shapes between populations.
  • Understanding the power of these tests is essential for reliable conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the statistical power of different shape equality tests.
  • To evaluate test performance across various landmark configurations and population shapes.
  • To identify the most powerful and reliable methods for morphometric analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Computation of power surfaces for multiple statistical tests.
  • Focus on the simplest case: three landmarks forming a triangle.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of T(2)-tests using Kendall tangent space and Bookstein shape coordinates.
  • Evaluation of Rao and Suryawanshi shape variables, EDMA-I T statistic, and EDMA-II Z statistic.

    • Main Results:

    • Goodall's F-test exhibited the highest statistical power.
    • T(2)-tests with Kendall coordinates performed well.
    • T(2)-tests with Bookstein coordinates were effective unless the baseline was the shortest side.
    • Rao and Suryawanshi variables and EDMA-I showed low power, especially for non-equilateral triangles.
    • EDMA-II demonstrated complicated power surfaces and issues with type I error rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Goodall's F-test is a highly powerful method for shape equality testing.
    • The choice of coordinates and baseline significantly impacts test power.
    • Some commonly used methods have limitations in power and accuracy.
    • Results inform practical applications in morphometrics and evolutionary studies.