Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of rhinostereometry compared with acoustic rhinometry.

H Hallén1, P Graf

  • 1Dept of otorhinolaryngology, Huddinge University and Soder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Acta Oto-Laryngologica
|March 23, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zoon vulvitis - a rare form of chronic inflammation of the vulva.

Ceska gynekologie·2018
Same author

General Assembly, Research Caveats: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2018
Same author

Bone infections caused by Gemella haemolysans.

Medecine et maladies infectieuses·2016
Same author

Radiographic outcomes in the coronal plane with iASSIST™ versus optical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: A preliminary case-control study.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2016
Same author

Reversible 2D Phase Transition Driven By an Electric Field: Visualization and Control on the Atomic Scale.

Nano letters·2015
Same author

Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee implants. Results of a series of 100 randomised cases after 9 years follow-up.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2015
Same journal

CT imaging parameters of the oval window region can predict the extent of stapes footplate exposure in patients with otosclerosis.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026
Same journal

Congenital middle ear anomalies: endoscopic outcomes, facial nerve anomalies, and bilateral consistency in 41 ears.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026
Same journal

Using the electronic baby bottle to support tongue-tie diagnosis in infants: a prospective study.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026
Same journal

Long-term outcomes and quantitative comparison of mucosal repair using skin grafting versus polyglycolic acid sheet application for cT1-2 oral cancer defect.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026
Same journal

Oral diadochokinesis as a candidate bedside indicator for swallowing dysfunction assessed by videoendoscopic evaluation using the Hyodo score: retrospective cross-sectional study.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026
Same journal

The effects of mismatch response-based programming on hearing and speech performances in cochlear implanted children: a follow-up study.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026
See all related articles

Acoustic rhinometry and rhinostereometry are sensitive methods for measuring nasal mucosal swelling. However, this study found a poor correlation between these two techniques in patients with vasomotor rhinitis.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Rhinitis Research

Background:

  • Nasal mucosa measurement presents challenges with various methods.
  • Acoustic rhinometry and rhinostereometry are recent, widely used techniques.
  • Rhinostereometry has limited comparative studies, raising questions about its validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the measurement results of acoustic rhinometry and rhinostereometry.
  • To evaluate the correlation between these two methods in assessing nasal mucosal swelling.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty patients with vasomotor rhinitis were included.
  • Histamine challenges at three concentrations were administered on two separate occasions.
  • Measurements were taken using both acoustic rhinometry and rhinostereometry, yielding 180 observations per method.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A poor but statistically significant correlation (p < 0.01, r = 0.25) was observed between the two methods.
  • Both techniques demonstrated sensitivity in detecting nasal mucosal swelling.

Conclusions:

  • Acoustic rhinometry and rhinostereometry are sensitive tools for studying nasal mucosal swelling.
  • There is a low degree of correlation between the results obtained from acoustic rhinometry and rhinostereometry.