Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Incorporating patient preferences into randomized trials.

M F Lambert1, J Wood

  • 1Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York, York, UK. mark.lambert@doctors.org.uk

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|March 24, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Considering patient preferences in clinical trial design is crucial. While designs like the partially randomized patient preference (PRPP) trial exist, no single method is perfect, necessitating careful thought on consent processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

BMJ case reports·2014
Same author

Evidence of b-jet quenching in PbPb collisions at √(s(NN))=2.76  TeV.

Physical review letters·2014
Same author

Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of neutral pions in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt[s](NN)] = 2.76 TeV.

Physical review letters·2014
Same author

Measurement of the Bs(0)→μ+ μ- branching fraction and search for B(0)→μ+ μ- with the CMS experiment.

Physical review letters·2014
Same author

Search for pair-produced dijet resonances in four-jet final states in pp collisions at sqrt[s] = 7 TeV.

Physical review letters·2014
Same author

Observation of the associated production of a single top quark and a W boson in pp collisions at sqrt[s] = 8 TeV.

Physical review letters·2014

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Medical Ethics
  • Patient-Centered Research

Background:

  • Ensuring patient preferences are considered is a key ethical and practical challenge in clinical trial design.
  • Traditional randomized trials may not fully accommodate patient preferences.
  • Several design variants exist to incorporate patient preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine various trial designs that account for patient preferences.
  • To analyze the scientific, ethical, and practical implications of these designs.
  • To specifically evaluate the merits of the partially randomized patient preference (PRPP) design.

Main Methods:

  • Review of different modifications to conventional trial consent and design.
  • Detailed consideration of the partially randomized patient preference (PRPP) design.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of implications on patient participation and result interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • The partially randomized patient preference (PRPP) design allows for patient preferences to be considered.
    • In PRPP studies, all eligible patients are followed, but the primary comparison remains between randomly allocated treatment arms.
    • Various trial design adjustments have distinct scientific, ethical, and practical consequences.

    Conclusions:

    • No single modified trial design is ideal for incorporating patient preferences.
    • Trial designers must carefully consider the consent process and its impact.
    • The implications of consent on participation and result interpretation require thorough evaluation.