Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Confounding and causality in epidemiology].

A Biggeri1

  • 1Dipartimento di Statistica G. Parenti Università di Firenze.

Epidemiologia E Prevenzione
|March 24, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sinonasal cancer incidence in Lombardy, Italy, 2008-20.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury in Italy during 2013-2014: a population-based study.

Spinal cord·2017
Same author

Fine airborne particles: when alarming levels are the standard.

Public health·2017
Same author

Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2014
Same author

Use of the parenteral antibiotic Ertapenem as short term prophylaxis in bariatric surgery: a pharmaco-kinetic-pharmacodynamic study in class III obese female patients.

Minerva anestesiologica·2014
Same author

High variability in results of semen analysis in andrology laboratories in Tuscany (Italy): the experience of an external quality control (EQC) programme.

Andrology·2013
Same journal

[Italian Cystic Fibrosis Registry (ICFR). Report 2023-2024].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2026
Same journal

[Multicenter experience of the Lombardy Health Protection Agencies (ATS) in the application of an algorithm to estimate disability prevalence and profiles based on routine administrative data: from data sharing to regional-level analysis].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2026
Same journal

[Errata corrige Errata corrige Epidemiol Prev 2026;50(1):37-47].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2026
Same journal

[Changes in agri-food production systems and nutritional profile of foods (1930-2024)].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2026
Same journal

["Tell me a story": the use of storytelling for the prevention of workplace injuries].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2026
Same journal

[A gravity model approach to the network of Centres for Assistance and Urgency and Emergency Department in Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy): a tool to support equitable access planning].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2026
See all related articles

Epidemiologists use specific methods to assess causality, facing challenges with confounding. Causal criteria for confounding improve identifying causal relationships in observational studies.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Causal inference
  • Observational studies

Context:

  • Epidemiology has developed distinct methodologies for assessing causal relationships.
  • Ensuring unbiasedness is a core principle, highlighting the significance of confounding.
  • Traditional definitions of confounding based on association criteria present inherent conflicts.

Purpose:

  • To explore the conflict in formal confounding definitions.
  • To present causal criteria for confounding.
  • To generalize the identifiability of causal relationships in observational studies.

Summary:

  • The study addresses the intrinsic conflict in the formal definition of confounding in epidemiology, which is based on association criteria.
  • It highlights that this conflict is practically resolved by incorporating subject-specific knowledge.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The research proposes causal criteria for confounding that generalize the identification of causal relationships within observational studies.

    • Impact:

    • Provides a refined understanding of confounding in epidemiological research.
    • Offers a framework for more robust causal inference from observational data.
    • Enhances the ability to identify true causal relationships, minimizing bias.