Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum ground-level concentrations with downwash--analysis.

W A Bowman1

  • 1Day & Zimmerman, Inc., Amarillo, Texas, USA. wbowman@pantex.com

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)
|March 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Urban ozone nonattainment: Interconnected challenges in the Intermountain Western U.S.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

DynLink-AQ: Adaptive inter-station connectivity for multi-pollutant, multi-horizon air quality forecasting across Delhi.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

Polonium-210 levels in placental maternal-fetal barrier: A pilot study conducted in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

China's carbon emissions trading system (ETS) helps the country slow down industrial solid waste accumulation.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

Pyrolysis technologies for valorisation of healthcare waste: A review on processes, products, and challenges.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

PM<sub>2.5</sub> removal efficiency by an urban green landscape: Effect of planting design and environmental factors.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
See all related articles

This study solves equations for maximum ground-level concentrations under downwash conditions, providing critical data for plume rise and dispersion modeling. Results aid in understanding pollutant dispersion from industrial sources.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Air Pollution Modeling

Background:

  • Understanding pollutant dispersion from sources near buildings is crucial for air quality management.
  • Previous research established equations for critical parameters influencing maximum ground-level concentrations (MGLC) under downwash conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To solve previously derived equations for critical downwind distance (xc), wind speed (uc), and plume rise (zc) that yield MGLC (chi c).
  • To present comprehensive data and graphical relationships for these parameters across various stack and building heights.
  • To compare findings with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) SCREEN3 model.

Main Methods:

  • Numerical solution of established aerodynamic downwash equations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tabulation of MGLC (chi c), critical downwind distance (xc), critical wind speed (uc), and critical plume rise (zc).
  • Graphical representation of relationships between wind speed (uc) and plume rise (zc) for different stack (hs) and building (hb) heights.
  • Main Results:

    • Solved equations provide specific values for xc, uc, and zc that result in maximum ground-level pollutant concentrations under downwash scenarios.
    • Presented tables and graphs offer practical data for dispersion analysis for turbines and reciprocating engines.
    • Comparisons indicate potential differences and similarities with the EPA's SCREEN3 model outputs.

    Conclusions:

    • The solved equations and presented data offer valuable insights into aerodynamic downwash effects on pollutant dispersion.
    • The findings can inform regulatory dispersion modeling and environmental impact assessments.
    • Further comparison with established models like SCREEN3 is warranted for broader applicability.