Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extracting charge density distributions from diffraction data: a model study on urea

de Vries RY1, Feil, Tsirelson

  • 1Chemical Physics Laboratory, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Acta Crystallographica. Section B, Structural Science
|March 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electron-density-based calculations of intermolecular energy: case of urea.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2000
Same author

Electron density study of urea using TDS-corrected X-ray diffraction data: quantitative comparison of experimental and theoretical results.

Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science·2000
Same author

Electron density and electrostatic potential of KNiF3: multipole, orbital and topological analyses of vacuum-camera-imaging plate and four-circle diffractometer data.

Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science·2000
Same author

Electron density of KNiF3: analysis of the atomic interactions

Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science·2000
Same author

Critical Analysis of Non-Nuclear Electron-Density Maxima and the Maximum Entropy Method.

Physical review letters·1996
Same author

Small free energy barrier and postdesorption collisions: The keys towards the understanding of reactive ion etching of silicon.

Physical review letters·1995

Extracting electron density distributions (EDD) using multipole refinement is unreliable for non-centrosymmetric crystals. Adding experimental errors significantly deforms the interaction density, making accurate EDD extraction impossible from X-ray diffraction data.

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate electron density distributions (EDD) are crucial for understanding chemical bonding.
  • Multipole refinement is a common method for deriving EDD from experimental diffraction data.
  • Previous studies have explored the accuracy of EDD extraction, but limitations in non-centrosymmetric systems remain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reliability of multipole refinement for extracting electron density distributions (EDD).
  • To assess the impact of experimental errors on the quality of derived EDD.
  • To determine the feasibility of obtaining accurate interaction densities from X-ray diffraction data for non-centrosymmetric crystals.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized CRYSTAL95 package for initial density function calculation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Convoluted stockholder-partioned densities with thermal smearing functions from neutron diffraction.
  • Performed POP multipole refinement on urea crystal structure factors.
  • Introduced random errors to structure factors to simulate experimental conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Achieved a good fit (R=0.6%) with initial structure factors, preserving interaction density characteristics.
    • Refinement with added random errors resulted in a poorer fit (R=1.1%) and a deformed interaction density.
    • Repetitions with different random errors yielded significantly different interaction density distributions.
    • The fitted EDD showed characteristics of the interaction density.

    Conclusions:

    • Multipole refinement can provide a good fit to experimental data.
    • However, the derived interaction density is highly sensitive to errors in structure factors.
    • Accurate interaction densities cannot be reliably obtained from X-ray diffraction data for non-centrosymmetric crystals.