Related Experiment Videos
The oculomotor distractor effect in normal and hemianopic vision
1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK. robin.walker@rhbnc.ac.uk
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|March 29, 2000
Summary
Visual distractors do not affect saccade latency in hemianopic subjects. However, normal subjects show increased saccade latency with distractors, suggesting normal target selection processes are involved.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Ophthalmology
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Hemianopia, a condition resulting from damage to the visual cortex, causes a loss of vision in one half of the visual field.
- Saccades are rapid, ballistic movements of the eyes that shift the point of fixation.
- Visual distractors can influence the speed and accuracy of saccadic eye movements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the inhibitory effect of visual distractors on saccade latency in individuals with hemianopia and in normal subjects.
- To determine if the crossed retinotectal pathway plays a role in inhibiting saccades in hemianopic subjects.
- To elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying saccade target selection.
Main Methods:
- Comparing saccade latency in hemianopic and normal subjects under conditions with and without visual distractors.
- Presenting distractors in the hemianopic field of hemianopic subjects and in the corresponding visual field of normal subjects.
- Analyzing the effect of distractor location (temporal vs. nasal) on saccade latency.
Main Results:
- Saccade latency in hemianopic subjects was unaffected by visual distractors in their hemianopic field.
- Normal subjects exhibited a significant increase in saccade latency when visual distractors were present.
- The increase in saccade latency was more pronounced with temporal distractors compared to nasal distractors.
Conclusions:
- The findings do not support the hypothesis that the crossed retinotectal pathway mediates a blindsight inhibitory effect in hemianopia.
- The observed distractor effect in normal subjects likely reflects standard saccade target selection mechanisms.
- Saccade target selection involves a complex circuit encompassing both cortical and subcortical brain structures.