Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Counterpoint on food irradiation.

D B Louria1

  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA. louriado@umdnj.edu

International Journal of Infectious Diseases : IJID : Official Publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases
|March 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Food irradiation technology is debated. Public policy should address unanswered questions from manufacturers before widespread adoption, despite the technology

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The epidemiology of drug abuse with some comments on prevention.

Pediatric annals·2014
Same author

Sulfonamides in experimental histoplasmosis.

Antibiotics & chemotherapy (Northfield, Ill.)·2014
Same author

FURTHER STUDIES ON IMMUNITY IN EXPERIMENTAL CRYPTOCOCCOSIS.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2009
Same author

Regarding dietary calcium to reduce lead toxicity.

Nutrition reviews·2001
Same author

Food irradiation: unresolved issues.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2001
Same author

Status of selected nutrients and progression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2000

Area of Science:

  • Food Science
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The abstract addresses the ongoing controversy surrounding food irradiation technology.
  • It highlights the existence of a heated debate between proponents and opponents.

Discussion:

  • The author expresses a conditional stance, not opposing the technology itself but its implementation as public policy.
  • A key point of contention is the lack of satisfactory answers from proponents and manufacturers regarding critical questions.

Key Insights:

  • The core argument centers on the need for transparency and accountability from the food irradiation industry.
  • Public policy decisions should be informed by addressing unresolved concerns before widespread adoption.

Outlook:

  • Further dialogue and clarification are necessary to resolve the controversy.
  • Future policy decisions may depend on the willingness of stakeholders to address outstanding questions.

Related Experiment Videos