Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: 'what children do know'?

C F Rowland1, J M Pine

  • 1Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Derby, UK. c.rowland@derby.ac.uk

Journal of Child Language
|March 31, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account.

Journal of child language·2001
Same author

Emergentism, parsimony and the development of process models of language acquisition.

Journal of child language·2000
Same author

Subject-verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: what low error rates hide.

Journal of child language·1998
Same author

Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development.

Journal of child language·1997
Same author

Syntactic categories in the speech of young children: the case of the determiner.

Journal of child language·1996
Same author

Reanalysing rote-learned phrases: individual differences in the transition to multi-word speech.

Journal of child language·1993
Same journal

Perceptual asymmetries in the development of lexical tone perception in Thai-learning children.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

To bind or not to bind: Individual differences in pronominal processing among adolescent Mandarin-English heritage speakers.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

Influence of Visual Context Stability on Word Learning in Fourteen- and Nineteen-Month-Old Children.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the Acquisition of Conditionals: Children's and Adults' Expression of Hypothetical Thought.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

The effect of distributional information on the categorization of unaccusativity.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

Examining the Robustness and Generalizability of the Shape Bias: A Meta-Analysis.

Journal of child language·2026
See all related articles

Children learn wh-questions by memorizing specific word combinations, not by applying abstract grammar rules. This finding supports constructivist theories of early language acquisition and distributional learning.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psycholinguistics
  • Child Language Acquisition
  • Linguistic Theory

Background:

  • Early wh-question development in children is complex, involving both correct production and subject-auxiliary inversion errors.
  • Existing movement rule accounts struggle to fully explain the observed patterns in early wh-question formation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze correct wh-question production and subject-auxiliary inversion errors in a child's early data.
  • To evaluate the explanatory power of movement rule accounts versus lexically-specific formulaic learning.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of longitudinal wh-question data from a single child (ages 2;3.4 to 4;10.23).
  • Comparison of observed inversion patterns with predictions from lexically-specific input frequencies and constructivist models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Movement rule accounts failed to explain the child's wh-question patterning.
  • The child's data aligns with learning lexically-specific wh-word + auxiliary combinations based on maternal input frequency.
  • Correctly inverted wh-questions can emerge without an explicit subject-auxiliary inversion rule.

Conclusions:

  • Early wh-question development is better explained by distributional learning of specific lexical formulae than by abstract movement rules.
  • Findings support constructivist theories emphasizing input-driven learning mechanisms in early multi-word speech.
  • The study has implications for understanding grammatical development theories, contrasting rule-based and constructivist perspectives.