Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Early fixation of an optimal genetic code.

S J Freeland1, R D Knight, L F Landweber

  • 1Department of Ecology, Princeton University, University of Bath, Bath, England.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|March 31, 2000
PubMed
Summary

The standard genetic code likely evolved to minimize errors from mutation and mistranslation. When considering biological constraints and empirical data, the canonical code is near optimal for error reduction, supporting an adaptive origin.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extended survival and reduced risk of AML progression in erythroid-responsive lenalidomide-treated patients with lower-risk del(5q) MDS.

Leukemia·2015
Same author

Extended survival and reduced risk of AML progression in erythroid-responsive lenalidomide-treated patients with lower-risk del(5q) MDS.

Leukemia·2013
Same author

Covert sex.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Sex-ratio adjustment in solitary and social spiders.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Intranuclear conflict and its role in evolution.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • The evolutionary origin of the canonical genetic code remains largely unknown.
  • A leading hypothesis suggests the code's structure minimizes the impact of translation and mutation errors on proteins.
  • Previous studies show mixed results regarding the code's optimality, often due to chosen metrics or ignored biological constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the canonical genetic code is optimized for error minimization under realistic biological constraints.
  • To re-evaluate the adaptiveness of the genetic code using empirical substitution data and plausible structural limitations.
  • To address discrepancies in previous analyses and clarify the role of natural selection in genetic code evolution.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Constrained theoretical analysis of possible genetic code structures.
  • Quantification of amino acid similarity using empirical substitution frequency data.
  • Comparison of the canonical code's error minimization efficiency against theoretical alternatives.

Main Results:

  • Under biologically plausible constraints and empirical similarity metrics, the canonical genetic code is near a global optimum for error minimization.
  • The canonical code's optimality is robust across various analytical methods and assumptions.
  • Significantly better codes are rare, and previous claims of non-adaptive codes stemmed from using a misleading metric.

Conclusions:

  • The arrangement of amino acid assignments in the standard genetic code is likely a product of natural selection for minimizing the phenotypic impact of genetic errors.
  • Known nonstandard genetic codes appear less adaptive, suggesting different evolutionary pressures before and after the canonical code's fixation.
  • While evidence for an adaptive code is strong, the precise evolutionary pathway requires further investigation.