Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Identification of OTX1 and OTX2 As Two Possible Molecular Markers for Sinonasal Carcinomas and Olfactory Neuroblastomas
Published on: February 28, 2019
Strength and specificity of different gene promoters in oral cancer cells
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. shillite@hscsyr.edu
Abstract:
Gene therapy of oral cancer will require expression of genes by promoters that are both powerful and relatively tumor specific. We compared the level of expression of a reporter gene from promoters of human cytomegalovirus (CMV), SV40 virus, mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV), human papillomaviruses (HPV) types 16 and 18, and the human multi-drug-resistance gene (mdr1), in several lines of oral cancer cells. In the oral cancer cell line 686LN the rank order of expression levels was: CMV > SV40 > HPV > mdr1 > MMTV. Unlike in previous reports the mdr1 promoter was no more active in two cancer cell lines with mutations in the p53 gene than in two other lines with wild-type p53, and its expression level could not be increased by either doxorubicin or taxol. On the other hand, expression from the MMTV promoter was increased over 10-fold by the presence of 1 microM dexamethasone. Thus, by an appropriate choice of promoter and inducer a wide variety of expression levels, over a 3-log range, could be attained in 686LN cells. The oral cancer-specificity of each promoter was judged by comparing expression in the neuroblastoma line IMR32. The most specific promoters were those from papillomaviruses, which were up to 45 times more active in the oral cancer cells, and the least specific was the CMV promoter. In order to find if an HPV-derived promoter was sufficient to produce expression of a suicide phenotype the 686 promoter was cloned adjacent to the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex and the construct was expressed from an adenovirus vector. The vector reduced the growth of 686LN cells over a 5-day period by up to 32% when optimal concentrations of virus and ganciclovir were used. These data will be valuable in the design of new constructs for gene therapy of oral cancer.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cell Specific Gene Expression
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region
Abnormal Proliferation
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Epigenetic Regulation
X-chromosome...

