Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Objective re-evaluation procedures in cases of possible diagnostic error].

R W Giard1, J M Broekman

  • 1Medisch Centrum Rijnmond-Zuid, locatie Clara, afd. Klinische Pathologie, Rotterdam. giard@bart.nl

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|April 4, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Clinical pathologists and radiodiagnosticians face liability for diagnostic errors. Objective re-evaluation of evidence by an independent expert is crucial for fair legal proceedings in medical malpractice cases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy: validation of the MSKCC breast nomogram.

Annals of surgical oncology·2009
Same author

The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion of the breast.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2007
Same author

[A fatal infection due to avian influenza-A (H7N7) virus and adjustment of the preventive measures].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[Sensitivity and speed of cell and tissue pre-diagnosis among breast cancer patients undergoing primary surgical treatment in two hospitals, determined with the aid of PALGA data].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[Evaluation of frozen sections and cytological diagnosis during surgery].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[The yield of breast cancer screening: the importance of observational data and the problems of bias].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Diagnostic Medicine
  • Forensic Pathology

Background:

  • Diagnostic specialists, including clinical pathologists and radiodiagnosticians, can be held legally liable for misdiagnoses.
  • Medical malpractice litigation often involves reconstructing diagnostic events and evaluating evidence against professional and legal standards.

Observation:

  • Courts or involved parties frequently request expert re-evaluation of diagnostic materials like microscopic slides and X-rays.
  • The process of re-evaluation must accurately reflect the original diagnostic context.

Findings:

  • A single expert familiar with the case's history may introduce bias, compromising objectivity.
  • Independent, objective evaluation procedures are necessary for accurate re-assessment of diagnostic evidence.

Related Experiment Videos

Implications:

  • Meticulous interpretation of re-evaluation results is essential for establishing their legal and clinical significance.
  • Courts must carefully consider the weight of expert re-evaluation findings in legal judgments.
  • Ensuring unbiased expert review strengthens the integrity of diagnostic error litigation.