Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Determining the differences among cost savings, cost avoidance, and cost reduction
1Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Abstract:
Cost savings, cost avoidance, and cost reduction are important factors to measure when valuing clinical pharmacy services. Currently, there are no universally accepted definitions for these terms. The authors of this study evaluated 44 articles which claimed to measure cost savings, cost avoidance, or cost reduction associated with clinical pharmacy services, and offered recommendations for when it would be appropriate to use these terms. Based on the results of our analysis, it is evident that controversy exists in the literature when determining if services result in cost avoidance or cost reduction. Therefore, there is a need for universally accepted definitions of these terms so that future research may evaluate such factors uniformly.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Methods of Medium Optimization

