Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A robust mixed linear model analysis for longitudinal data.

P S Gill1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Okanagan University College, Kelowna BC, Canada. pgill@okanagan.bc.ca

Statistics in Medicine
|April 6, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mistaking a Tumour for an Infection - Acrometastasis of the Finger from Endocervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Malaysian orthopaedic journal·2021
Same author

Diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis by immuno-PCR assay based on mycobacterial antigen 85 complex detection.

Letters in applied microbiology·2021
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Association between Smoking Exposure, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response and Survival Outcomes following Radical Cystectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Genetic structure of three populations of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): Implications for genetic management.

American journal of primatology·2020
Same author

Carbohydrate restriction for glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2018
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study presents robust methods for analyzing longitudinal data using mixed effects linear models, accounting for individual differences and time-dependent data. These techniques improve parameter estimation for clinical trial data, such as in multiple sclerosis research.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Longitudinal data analysis requires methods to handle both between-subject variability and within-subject correlation.
  • Mixed effects linear models are commonly used but require robust parameter estimation techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe robust procedures for estimating parameters in mixed effects linear models for longitudinal data.
  • To incorporate random subject effects and autocorrelation to model complex data structures.
  • To illustrate the application of these methods using data from a multiple sclerosis clinical trial.

Main Methods:

  • Development of robust estimation procedures for mixed effects linear models.
  • Inclusion of fixed regression parameters, random subject effects, and autocorrelation terms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of empirical Bayesian estimation for subject effects.
  • Validation using a multiple sclerosis clinical trial dataset.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed robust procedures provide reliable parameter estimates for mixed effects linear models.
    • The methods effectively accommodate between-subject variability and within-subject autocorrelation.
    • Empirical Bayesian estimation offers a viable approach for subject effect estimation.

    Conclusions:

    • Robust estimation procedures are crucial for accurate analysis of longitudinal data in clinical research.
    • Mixed effects linear models with random effects and autocorrelation are powerful tools for complex datasets.
    • The demonstrated application highlights the utility of these methods in multiple sclerosis studies.